|
Edited on Sun May-17-09 09:18 AM by saltpoint
always the same thing.
In the 2008 election, Obama/Biden out-polled McCain/Palin, but the Republicans lost more than the vote count.
Voters shrunk the GOP to a fierce, loud, unstable and mostly ridiculous regional party. There are significant clusters of them in places like Tennessee and South Carolina, but states they surely assumed were in the bag -- Indiana, Florida, North Carolina, Colorado, etc. -- went blue this time. Against the first Afro-American presidential candidate and an up-nawth Yankee from Delaware.
John McCain tried to sell the hero/maverick image and voters weren't buying.
What's still standing for the Republicans in the wake of a powerful historic election does not appear to inspire much confidence regarding viability and governance for the future. Their chairman is a flibbertigibbet. Their big-time talk-host celebs are questioned and ridiculed. Their would-be candidates for 2012 are re-runs and has-beens, and that's on a good day; as well they are old miserable war horses like Newt Gingrich; new nobodies like Tim Pawlenty; prepubescent punks like Paul Ryan; ego maniacs like Mitt Romney; mean-spirited snakes like John Ensign; venal incompetents like John Boehner; and on down the list of predictable and therefore dismissable/defeatable wannabes. George Allen seems to me as viable a candidate for the GOP in 2012 as Newt Gingrich.
Some students are protesting President Obama's address at Notre Dame, but not all of them are. Most of them are not, in fact. My hunch is that History will be inclined toward the president's speeches and against a few anti-abortion protesters. Those protesting the president's appearance are free to speak up but the rest of the country appears to have left them behind in a broader prioritizing of crises. Their drawn-up protest signs may be dwarfed in just a couple paragraphs of Obama's address. He's no slouch with language and I think the smart money is on him to prevail handsomely in this extremely minor regional scuffle.
I don't believe the GOP can bring down a gifted man like Barack Obama with ignorance and anger.
I think that when you abandon Abraham Lincoln, you're asking for trouble. Under scrutiny the GOP doesn't appear to stand for anything except negative things, and voters are disinclined to endorse more negativity. If Obama is not a far-left firebrand, neither is he anywhere near conservative enough for the FOX News propagandists or the neo-con instigators like Bill Kristol.
Obama is a far-improved model than the guy who was in there the last 8 years, and voters know it. Mitch McConnell knows it. Very slowly, through their inherent cognitive difficulties, the Far Right will learn the same thing. They have no ideas. They have no strategic line of assault. Their leaders are lackluster, ineffective, and idiotic. It was quite a binge but the bottle's about empty and a ferocious hangover awaits.
The Republicans did not "win." The lost. And they lost big.
|