Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Jamestown Colony was mostly Gay Men who often got Gay-Married & adopted Indian Children together

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:21 PM
Original message
The Jamestown Colony was mostly Gay Men who often got Gay-Married & adopted Indian Children together
Homo Sex in Colonial America

<snip>

When both US News and the New Yorker ran pieces on the 400th anniversary of Jamestown in 2007, they were both so annoyingly ignorant of the fact that almost all of its inhabitants were men that I submitted my thoughts to both magazines. US News, which appeared first, of course said No, (they never have liked gays very much), but the New Yorker, which ran their Commemorative Piece a few months later, published the following from my letter to the editor:

"Jamestown was initially an all-male settlement. ...in subsequent years...male colonists outnumbered women by roughly six to one in the 1620's and four to one in later decades... It is difficult to believe that a group of young and notoriously unbridled men remained celibate for an extended period of time. It seems likely that some male settlers deprived of female companionship would have turned to each other instead.


"Settlers in the seventeenth-century Chesapeake often paired off to form all-male households, living and working together. ...it would be truly remarkable if all the male-only partnerships lacked a sexual ingredient... IT SEEMS REASONABLE TO ASSUME, {my caps and bold}, that much of the sex that took place... was sodomitical."

These words are from Sexual Revolution in Early America, by Richard Godbeer an associate professor at UC Riverside and published by Johns Hopkins.

More:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-kramer/homo-sex-in-colonial-amer_b_205399.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. It seems more reasonable that if they wanted female companionship
it would have been fairly easily had among native women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. There wasn't much attested intermarriage in the Colonial period.
Not nearly as much as generally occurs when two cultures live side-by-side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I wasn't talking about marriage n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Don't know about Jamestown
but at Plymouth there were a group of settlers who went to Cape Cod rather than to live in the confines of the colony. Here's a quotation with citation about them:

from "Gordon B. Hinckley, Shoulder for the Lord" by G. M. McCune, p. 35:

Two of the early immigrants to Plymouth Colony were Gabriel Wheldon of Arnold, Nottingham, England, and his brother (name unknown0. Gabriel had been married in England before sailing to America, but his first wife named Margaret, evidentally was deceased at tht time of his migration.

Both brothers had a free spirit much like Stephen Hopkins and found their way to the camps of the Wampanoags. There they both fell in love with two of the daughters of Chief Quadequina, younger brother to the Great Chief. The eaach married and Gabriel gave his second wife the English name 'Margaret' after his first spouse. The two counseled with their father-in-law and his older brother Massasoit regarding what to do. The Plymouth Colony would probably punish them for their intermarriage. Massasoit advised them to return to the colony and all would be well.

The Plymouth Colony tribunals saved face by banishing the couples from Plymouth for life but did not send them back to England. Gabriel and Margaret established their home in [Mattacheese, later Yarmouth,}Barnstable where the Hinckleys come in the late 1630s and here Gabriel and Margaret raised a large family of girls. One of these was Catherine 'Catone' Wheldon who married Stephen Hopkins' oldest son Giles on 9 Oct 1639.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. Pochahantas and John Rolfe
were the famous couple, mostly because formal arrangements were so rare. The English came mainly to colonize, and in later years brought significant numbers of women over and discouraged intermingling.

The Spanish, on the other hand, did mix a lot with the native peoples, and even developed a complex system of terms for the offspring of these unions. There are collections of paintings depicting the various categories: the Denver museum had a collection of charming domestic scenes showing a father from class A, a mother from class B and their children in class C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. The Spanish did intermarry quite a bit,
as usually happens when cultures shared the same territory. The English were fairly noteworthy in the extent to which they shunned regular relations with their neighbors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #22
34. So did the French
especially the fur traders. There's a fascinating book, Ghost Empire that speculates what North America would be like if the more tolerant French Catholic attitude (OK, the author's French-Canadian and has a bias) prevailed instead of the British get-them-out-of-the-way-so-we-can-take-their-land one. Getting back to the original topic, this book hints at a strong relationship between the explorer LaSalle and one of his native guides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. IF they WANTED female companionship. My guess is, many did NOT. Maybe MOST. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Why not? The premise of the OP is that they more or less became gay in the absence of women
I say, "what absence of women?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Exactly. There were plenty of hot Native American chicks to be wooed, bought, or enslaved.
There was no shortage of women.

Also, you have to read the whole piece for the greater context, not just the four paragraphs I can post.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. The English generally shunned any and all contact with the Native Americans,
Edited on Tue May-19-09 10:34 PM by Occam Bandage
except for during their frequent skirmishes. Women were not the only resource they didn't import from their neighbors; early settlers ignored Native American superiority in fishing, hunting, and farming techniques, preferring instead to import supplies and attempt rudimentary husbandry. They also seemingly deliberately ignored Native American techniques in warfare, eschewing effective woodland weapons like the tomahawk for inefficient but culturally European weapons like the musket. Were it not for the superiority of steel over stone, the English would likely have been driven into the sea.

The early settlers did end up importing women from England once the colony was stable enough that they could afford to support them. They imported many, many necessities and luxuries as well, despite the various Native American tribes demonstrating daily how to provide for a self-sufficient society not a full day's walk away. They even imported food during the early years, for God's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Equating situational homosexuality to gay marriage is not an argument I am comfortable with.
Edited on Tue May-19-09 08:29 PM by Occam Bandage
It feeds into the right-wing theory that homosexuality is simply a choice made by depraved people who wish alternate routes of sexual satisfaction due to some internal or external factor.

On edit: I see I misinterpreted the tone of the letter. Or rather, interpreted it correctly, but for the wrong reasons. Regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Article says their relationships were recognized in ceremonies binding them under god.
Sounds like gay marriage to me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. An extraordinary claim. Without any context or evidence, I can't say
that it's anything more than an interesting claim, and that I would look forward to seeing the primary sources used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. +1
I completely agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. This explains the pink triangle that welcomes folks to Jamestown, Williamsburg and Yorktown. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Are you series? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. It's got the two points on the top, but it IS a pink triangle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. OMFG! You're right Jamestown is STILL GAY! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Oh my god I never noticed that
Edited on Tue May-19-09 10:24 PM by underpants

I grew in Yorktown (York County), actually worked IN Yorktown (bar), and many jobs in and around "the 'burg"

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. I wish I were having Thanksgiving with my Freeper uncle this year.
I would make sure to mention this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. I find this to be ridiculous.... Were some men gay?--undoubtedly
More power to them... But to argue that the absence of lily white english women turned them teh gay? Sounds like an argument the RW wants to make about "electing to be homosexual" rather than born gay.... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #15
28. I think they saw the recruitment posters and it attracted teh gay.
"Go ye to the New World and do manly things with manly men, with hardly any women around to distract ye. Fabulous!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. I read this as Jonestown which made it even more confusing -nt-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. We both need our eyes checked.
I did the same! LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chatnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #16
31. I did as well!
Which set off all manner of weird speculation in my head. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. Hmm, I learn somehting new every day ...
... I had no idea that "sodomitical" was a word.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. But I think "Buggeriffic" is one I just made-up. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
33. It may be an overstatement.
Perhaps the sex was merely sodomitical...ish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. edit-dupe
Edited on Tue May-19-09 10:24 PM by underpants
whoops see post above
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. They had hands and pigs right?
this seems like a awful big leap of assumption
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
27. I always found Williamsburg to be a lot gayer than Jamestown
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
specialed Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
30. My family came to America via James Town.....
and I've often said I come from a long line of dead people who would bang anyone given half the chance. (RIMSHOT!) Oh......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnutbutr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
32. **WTF, most ridiculous piece of assuming garbage I've read in awhile**
Where do people come up with this shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. **You have the intellectual acumen of a turnip.**
This "shit" is not unprecedented. Did you even bother to read the article or are you simply offering a knee-jerk reaction to a post on DU?

In order to consider Kramer's argument you obviously need more context. Well, (insult removed), let me point you to this link to get the ball rolling: http://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/index.htm">Homosexuality in Eighteenth-Century England.

You might also want to research Larry Kramer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC