|
I am of the opinion that Michael Steele actually could have been a positive influence. I remember when he started out trying to say he wanted the GOP to appeal to even the left-handed midgets--he occasionally made statements that tried to sound like the minority youth or more "Meghan McCain"/ "culture wars are so 90's" Republicans needed to be front and center.
But he isn't really welcome in the teabagging milleaux. He might be able to bridge Limbaugh and McCain, and have the flexibility to promote both points of view, but the party took the power of the purse away from him, and complained whenever he tried to make sense publically. I think he has made some tactical errors, but means well for his party, and has been too much dismissed to be effective. But I think, in a way, they can't take down any prominent Republican, just because they can't afford to lose any. I don't think it's necessarily a "black thing." I think it's a "how do we change horses" thing that keeps him viable. If they went with their gut--Pat Buchanan might be the RNC head right now.
(Just pausing to think of a Democratic century ahead....done.)
|