Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there a point at which cutting state and local budgets is counter-productive?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:52 PM
Original message
Is there a point at which cutting state and local budgets is counter-productive?
Listening to the radio today, it seems that governors are in a race to the bottom trying to cut their state budgets. The same goes for local school board. Some years ago, the paper here published a study suggesting that spending money to run good schools was very cost effective since good schools increased property values. It occurs to me that this applies to a lot of state and local services. At what point do good roads, good schools, libraries, hospitals,etc pay for themselves by attracting people to a locality? At what point do budget cuts start driving people away?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think you need an answer, but you make an excellent point.
When these folks start seeing their property values tank, they have the "do-nothing government" they've been wishing for to blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, part of it is that the "starve the beast" mentality still hangs on in some places
And I think it's also likely that the Bushies were cutting revenue sharing(a step that also forced deeper cuts at the state and local levels)in a kind of economic "Burn Paris" strategy. After 2005 or 2006, they probably figured out that their party was on the way out nationally and decided that forcing through even more austerity would be a good method to sabotage whoever replaced them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yup. It's Norquist's wet dream ...


No pun intended.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I realized you didn't intend a pun
Still, you do owe me for the bottle of whiskey I have to run out and buy in order to blot that visual of Norquist out of my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. If there's a hell, I hope there's a special place for Grover Norquist. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. We have many small towns doing just that - closing libraries, school
programs, etc.
PA state had a long history of doing this with the State mental hospitals, too. The soultion seems to just let mentally ill people wind up in prison with no treatment. Cheaper that way.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Or living under a bridge; that's cheaper too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. State and local officials can't just print money to fund a defecit
Smart government investment in infrastructure and public services may pay for itself in the long run, but a lot of governors and local officials are facing huge short term revenue shortfalls due to the recession and are faced with tough choices. That's why you're seeing a lot of budget cuts these days.

But the spirit of you post is correct. The academic term for a city or region that neglects its roads, schools, libraries, parks, and public transit is a "shithole".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I'm looking at California vs. New York. As near as I can tell, California has
done very well during the last 30 years, but taxes were cut and cut. Now California is really hurting during this slump. New York, especially Upstate New York, has been struggling for the last 30 years, but we maintained our tax rates. (All you have to do is check out the constant claims that New York taxes were driving jobs from the state). We're facing some cuts now, but nothing as draconian as what is being proposed in California. Did the ongoing investment in New York provide a cushion now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. New York has had an infusion of hundreds of billions of taxpayer $$$ flow through it
in the recent past (bailout). In fact, NYC officials argued that denying the ability of Wall Street firms to pay bonuses from taxpayer bailout monies would cripple local economies. (I believe collapsing property values in Manhattan were mentioned. :nopity: )

So the comparison is way off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GKirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't know what else...
...they can do. They must work with the amount of money that they have. It's not unlike your budget or mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. how about reducing the salaries of all the upper levels of their government?
The salaries and perks of the head honchos are almost never cut, while the first services to get cut are needed.

My local mental health facility is booked solid till July, with many people needing counseling and help due to stress and longterm unemployment. What do they do? They CUT emergency walk-in care. Now these unemployed folks have only the option of 911 after they have a meltdown - ER charges, and whatever other costs are involved in emergencies.

Pennywise and pound-foolish, as my Nana used to say. Cut the salaries of the upper pencil pushers to provide the NEEDED help for the people suffering most. There should be NO job protection at ANY level when things are bad. The public SERVANTS need to know that they too can *feel the pain.*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. I know this is just anectodal,
but several years ago in a discussion with someone about the price of houses, taxes, and schools, that person mentioned someone he knew who's bought a home with the lowest local taxes, not making the connection between low taxes and crappy schools, and now could not sell his place. A couple of miles away was a better school district, higher local taxes and, surprise, surprise, a housing market where the homes actually sold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. BUT BUT BUT
WI IS A TAX HELL! so the republiklans always squeal. bet the same in 'taxechusetts'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC