Is there an inside "conspiracy" against Barack Obama?

[kentuck]

Seriously.

Yesterday, we had the FBI chief tell us that it would not be wise to put these terrorists at Guantanamo into US prisons. Then, 90 Senators voted with the FBI. Just 6 months ago, the majority were supportive of candidate Barack Obama's plan to close Guantanamo.

Today, we learn that the "Feds" have busted a plot in NYC to bomb Jewish synagogues and to shoot down military planes. The "Feds" supplied the fake bombs to these "terrorists" before they busted them. Do real terrorists buy bombs from undercover "Feds"? Or did they receive them for no money?

Also, yesterday, we heard the news that Iran had developed a missile that could reach Israel and the US military bases in the Middle East. It was a scary story. It was meant to be scary. But was it true?

Maybe we don't want to put on our tinfoil hats just yet, but there seems to be a coordinated plan against the Obama policies of dealing with the terrorists. Nothing happens by accident in politics.

[polichick]

1. Well, something is going on - maybe Cheney is at work and that's why Obama...

...doesn't support prosecutions.

[Lint Head]

2. I knew someone that was in the CIA. He always said you do not

want to know what I do and if the American people knew what was done in their name there would probably be a revolution.
It is within the Black Ops and CIA's prerogative to have set these scenarios up. They wouldn't necessarily launch the missile but they could set up the situation politically and subversively to facilitate it's launch.
:dem:

[kentuck]

5. Google..

Tony Poe in the Vietnam War and follow the connections up thru the Watergate burglars and thru the guy that destroyed the tapes on torture and up to Dick Cheney. These criminals have been in control forever and they are still pulling the strings.

[peacetalksforall]

8. In regards to Iran, ff the CIA or FBI can set it up, why not Mossad also?

[Badgerman]

3. No conspiracy necessary...it is

Either Obama is a politician, and said what was necessary to get elected, or he overestimated his abilities to recruit trusted advisers. If the second, then he displays a weakness for following bad advise.

Personally I believe it is a combination of the two: He is first a politician, and second an academician. Politicians lie to the public, and academicians lie to themselves.

think about it.

[spanone]

4. wrong

[Badgerman]

6. Mind giving some details for that conclusion?

[H2O Man]

7. Yes, definitely.

It's not "tin foil" at all. It's a combination of common sense and rational thought. The model to consider is the administration of President Kennedy. Not in the sense of comparing VP Biden to LBJ, of course, but two other factors: the entrenched bureaucrats, and those the President either appointed to "reach out" to the other side (as well as those he did not replace when he took office).

[kentuck]

10. I was thinking of the same model, Waterman...

and how close we could be to a similar historic event or tragedy...

[peacetalksforall]

9. I believe it's Congress in addition to the sub-government who wants perpetual war,.

Bayh and his boys/girls will do as much damage as the established intelligence, the military, the Federal and Supreme Court judges, and the lobbyists, especially AIPAC and all the lobbyists supporting war on Iran and Palestinians. It is formidable. And then we have the DLC entrenched. A lot of different values pushers with power given to them by Republicans.

It's up to us. Expose them. And vote them out of office.

Center and Right of Center is not where it's at.

It's about bringing back the values of the little people.

Enough of being ruled by corporate-religious-military-empire building conglomerates.