Will abortion clinic bombers finally be arrested as Terrorists?

[symbolman]

Seriously, if those Terror clowns who were going to bomb a synagogue were caught, arrested, Charged with Terrorism, are we finally going to see Abortion clinic bombers hauled off to prison for murdering Doctors, Nurses & pregnant women?

Or is that a Third Rail even President Obama doesn't want to touch...

[NOW tense]

1. Are they muslim or christian? n/t

[masuki bance]

2. You can get arrested on terrorism charges for just making

bomb threats.

[dflprincess]

5. You can be arrested for making terroristic threats (eom)

[flvegan]

3. Unlikely. Though animal rights activists running a website will be.

Killing in the name of Jesus is okay.

[omega minimo]

4. No because those killers were preserving life

:sarcasm:

[Orrex]

6. *Innocent* life, don't forget

After they're born, well, they're on their own.

[omega minimo]

7. oh so the woman who is pregnant -- and others around the clinic -- aren't "innocent?"

[Orrex]

8. Exactly. Only the fetus. Or the embryo, as the case may be.

Everyone else involved in the equation is a murderer deserving of the ultimate penalty, as the righteous defenders of life like to say.

[omega minimo]

9. So the only place innocence exists is inside the womb

[Orrex]

11. Perhaps my sarcasm is transmitting poorly here

I hoped that the second post was sufficiently over-the-top, but...

[omega minimo]

12. oh look! It's Orrex!!

:spray: yeah their homicidal hypocritical worldview is pretty ironic.

[Orrex]

14. Well, there's nothing rational to be said about them. so...

They're clearly murderers, and they're clearly terrorists. And they've clearly set themselves up as Upholders Of God's Will.

Short of locking them all up--which would be a terrific first step--I'd love to hear suggestions on how to engage them in a discussion. Do we start by saying "You're not actually a Holy Warrior" or something?

:shrug:

[omega minimo]

15. or just a reality check, tell them

NOT everyone on the PLANET wants to KISS your pastor's FAT sick ASS

[TankLV]

27. That's why straight men are still trying to get back in...

[KakistocracyHater]

10. maybe but only AFTER u call them health clinics

because that is what they really are-even seen that Liftime series "Strong Medicine?" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0252019/

...User Comments
(Comment on this title)
8 out of 10 people found the following comment useful:-
entertaining, albeit typical Lifetime fare, 6 March 2005
Author: blanche-2 from United States

Produced by Whoopi Goldberg, Strong Medicine is an immensely popular show, currently starring Rosa Blasi and Patricia Richardson. Both are very strong actresses. The rest of the cast is peppered with interesting characters and good acting as well. Jenifer Hawkins is particularly enjoyable as Lana, who always speaks of herself in the third person. The talented Phil Casnoff plays the head of the hospital.

Strong Medicine is a real women's show, and why not - it's on Lifetime, after all. It's preachy and talky as all get-out. Somehow it manages to entertain quite often with compelling stories. It just hits its messages a little too hard. But I imagine if you don't have much medical education and you're a fan of this show's, you've picked up a lot of valuable information. That is, after all, one of its objectives, and it succeeds admirably. ".....

They showed the inside of the lie-called "abortion clinic"

[omega minimo]

13. THANK YOU

[symbolman]

16. didn't mean to diss them

been inside quite a few and talked to the nuts outside.. Uh, can I still call them Nuts? Back when I worked in a few nuthouses that's what they were called..

Just can't keep up with the PC bullshit, & don't like it either, the ARE Abortion clinics because that's what they're doing in there.. Might have noticed I'm Opposed to idiots blowing them up..

A Spade is a spade.

[cali]

17. it's already happened in some cases

[votingupstart]

18. they are????? where have you been??

look at the guy who did the alabama clinics and the olympic park in atlanta - he had to hide in caves because they were turning the area over looking for him(i cant remember his name)
any bombing in the US is looked at very closley especially now a days. look at that head DR who got is SUV blown up a few months ago, with in hours there was ATF, FBI, State, local hell even the post office was probably there.

[mitchum]

20. And the bushco justice dept declined to bring capital murder charges against that scumbag Rudolph...

no charges were brought against his fellow gawdfearing hillbillies who helped hide his worthless ass for years AND he was allowed to present an insane manifesto against choice and homosexuality after sentencing

[votingupstart]

21. He didn't give anyone up - NO EVIDENCE = NO CHARGES

would you prefer that the gov just start arresting everyone who believes the same way as he does regardless of the actual evidence?

be careful of taking that step - talk about slippery slope

[mitchum]

22. Generally, when someone is allowed to plea bargain in order to avoid the needle...

they are required to give others up. The bushco justice dept did not make that a stipulation for scumbag Rudolph.
I wonder why...

You're not fooling anyone.

[votingupstart]

24. so it appears you cannot get your facts right

.26 seconds on google and i found this


On April 8, 2005, the Department of Justice announced that it and Rudolph agreed to a plea bargain under which Rudolph would plead guilty to all charges he was accused of in exchange for avoiding the death penalty. The deal was confirmed after the FBI found 250 pounds (113 kg) of dynamite he hid in the forests of North Carolina. His revealing the hiding places of the dynamite was a condition of his plea agreement.

so he gave up 250Lbs of dynamite, plead guilty to all charges, and avoided the death penalty -- sounds like the prosecutor took the big win instead of a possible hit or miss prosecution - would you do something different MR US Attorney. yea he WAS helped out, will you be able to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt in a courtroom in front of a jury from the area that he was caught in?? even if you were would the jury just say not guilty because they believed in his cause. go ahead roil the dice.

YOU are not fooling anyone - i believe that people should be held accountable for their actions - SOME people continue to blame the past and fail to move on, continually bashing will do nothing to help advance our causes/beliefs/needs both as political parties or as a nation

you = FAIL -- you check your facts like i spell - POORLY

[mitchum]

26. No, you fail, jackass...

"will you be able to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt in a courtroom in front of a jury from the area that he was caught in?? even if you were would the jury just say not guilty because they believed in his cause. go ahead roil the dice"

He didn't commit his murder and maiming in the mountains of NC...so why in the fuck would he have been tried there?

He was not required to give up any of his co-conspirators (and he had many) How...odd.
THAT was what I stated and you did not dispute that.
Now, go and fondle your fucking strawman some more.

[votingupstart]

29. cant get your facts right and i'm the jack ass - right - you fail again

your an idiot because you still cant get your facts right - and you still have not answered the questions in the other post so your still a failure and an idiot and a JACKASS. Go ahead - still argue with emotion not the facts - i'm sure that strategy will work out for you in the future.

think about this smart guy - what happens to your prosecution case when he gets acquitted on a couple of the charges even or gets one critical piece of evidence thrown out, it puts a dent in your other cases because now he has been "acquitted" or "framed" think OJ and the trial there. Now instead of putting him on trial to answer for multiple crimes at one time ( so that if he gets acquitted on one he can still be locked up for the others) and on multiple charge cases there is a higher statistical chance that he will get convicted on all charges - you want to split it up into several small po-dunk trials and take a chance that you will get every single piece of evidence thrown out. ( clue for you - statistically the more times a piece of evidence is handled the more likley it is to be thrown out of court for technical reasons) DO YOUR HOMEWORK before you start typing - now you look like an idiot who has nothing to say -- jackass


oh and P.S.
HE WAS CONVICTED OF MURDER - something you said "bushco justice dept wouldnt do" - refer to you previous post if you dont believe me

-- jackass

[Fire_Medic_Dave]

19. Who are they?

[tom_paine]

23. No. Bushies, be they White Supremacists with nerve gas, or abortion clinic bombers

are NEVER considered terrorists.

But Animal Rights activists chalking slogans on the sidewalk and handing out leaflets are.

Kinder and Gentler Nazi Germany. And I am so grateful that, at least for the moment, we're kinder and gentler.

Hitler and his henchmen spoiled it for the "Bushie Brand" by going over the top and in your face. Now the Bushies have to have extra Plausible Deniability.

[Dappleganger]

25. They consider it a holy war...

so they should be treated just like terrorists. These thugs are a blight on humanity and the church.

[Badgerman]

28. $10 says Eric Holder wouldn't prosecute them as terrorists! n/t