Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nobody's life, liberty, or property is secure while the Legislature is in session

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:51 PM
Original message
Nobody's life, liberty, or property is secure while the Legislature is in session
An old political quote, yes, but it has proven itself true far too many times since 2000.

So now it happens again in California with Proposition 8. I like the angle that the California Supreme Court is leaving the door open for an appeal to go all the way to SCOTUS, but I also agree that this may take too long.

A group of politically motivated Mormons managed to outflank supporters of gay marriage. For now. It doesn't mean that Californians can't bounce back and undo the law on their own with another special election.

All I can suggest at this time is that if you haven't done so yet and if you live in California, you get up, you learn the process of introducing a ballot issue, you gather enough signatures to force a vote, you do whatever it takes to make the state consider the issue once again at the ballot box.

Do it for your spouse. Or for your neighbors. Or for Harvey Milk. Or someone. By all means, make it personal, because it is personal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Will do
I'll do whatever I can

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Legislature could fix this in two seconds
Pass a law that California is an all civil union state. OR revise the Constitution. I hate that people don't know what the decision really said because they need to move pronto on the civil union legislation.

"Proposition 8 does not entirely repeal or abrogate the aspect of a same-sex couple’s state constitutional right of privacy and due process that was analyzed in the majority opinion in the Marriage Cases — that is, the constitutional right of same-sex couples to “choose one’s life partner and enter with that person into a committed, officially recognized, and protected family relationship that enjoys all of the constitutionally based incidents of marriage” (Marriage Cases, supra, 43 Cal.4th at p. 829). Nor does Proposition 8 fundamentally alter the meaning and substance of state constitutional equal protection principles as articulated in that opinion. Instead, the measure carves out a narrow and limited exception to these state constitutional rights, reserving the official designation of the term “marriage” for the union of opposite-sex couples as a matter of state constitutional law, but leaving undisturbed all of the other extremely significant substantive aspects of a same-sex couple’s state constitutional right to establish an officially recognized and protected family relationship and the guarantee of equal protection of the laws.
By clarifying this essential point, we by no means diminish or minimize the significance that the official designation of “marriage” holds for both the proponents and opponents of Proposition 8; indeed, the importance of the marriage designation was a vital factor in the majority opinion’s ultimate holding in the Marriage Cases, supra, 43 Cal.4th 757, 845-846, 855. Nonetheless, it is crucial that we accurately identify the actual effect of Proposition 8 on same-sex couples’ state constitutional rights, as those rights existed prior to adoption of the proposition, in order to be able to assess properly the constitutional challenges to the proposition advanced in the present proceeding. We emphasize only that among the various constitutional protections recognized in the Marriage Cases as 8 available to same-sex couples, it is only the designation of marriage — albeit significant — that has been removed by this initiative measure."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Revising the Constitution could be fun - but get a headcount in Sacramento
It takes a lot of momentum to get an amendment considered. Once the vote is cast, the momentum tends to dissipate if the amendment is defeated, like what happened to the Equal Rights Act on Capitol Hill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. So pass Civil Unions For Everybody
Like this decision just said. The legal rights are 100% guaranteed for everybody, so make it the same institution for everybody to get them. Civil Unions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Electorally - it is as important to remove one of their vote(r)s by any means necessary as
it is to foster and produce one of ours.

It still would be a gain of one vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. California is ruled by the mob and the special interests that propaganize them.
"The People will vote away their rights" --Ben Franklin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC