from a publication in Wasilla: "Will the Antichrist be a homosexual?"

marmar

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu May-28-09 09:03 PM
Original message

from a publication in Wasilla: "Will the Antichrist be a homosexual?"

Wasilla. What a town! :scared:

Will the Antichrist be a homosexual?
By Ron Hamman

Religion Views
Published on Monday, May 25, 2009 9:15 PM AKDT

In answering this question, it is important to assert the question does not originate with me, lest someone out there think that I am bringing some new doctrine out to bolster the political climate. But as the study of Bible prophecy includes verbiage as to the behavior of the one called �that Wicked� by Paul in II Thessalonians, it is not only a legitimate question to ask, but also one to answer.

While the word �homosexual� is not in the Bible, the behavior of those who practice homosexuality, and God�s estimation of them, very definitely is. When the word came into existence I cannot tell you, but what we can say for sure is that when Noah Webster published his first dictionary in 1828, it was not included. This means that homosexuality is a modern word invented to replace the word Noah Webster did include, sodomy, defined as a crime against nature. This is historical revisionism in action.

Sodomy is defined in scripture by two things, the first being that of where it began: Sodom. In Genesis 13:13 we have the first mention of the men of Sodom, pronouncing that they �were wicked and sinners before the Lord exceedingly.� Their saga is continued in chapters 18 and 19 with their sin being so great that not only does God say that it �is very grievous,� but he himself comes down to destroy them with fire, the rubble of which still stands as a warning to us today.

While the Genesis account does not graphically describe their sin, leading some to deny it as being the same as homosexuality, their sin is obviously just that by how it is described: lying with mankind as with womankind. What other conclusion can be reached when they want to �know� the men who were in Lot�s house, the same word the Bible uses in Genesis 4 in relation to the conception of Cain? And that Lot himself understood their intentions is clear; not only did he call such behavior wicked, but he also offered his virgin daughters as substitutes, which the men of Sodom refused.

And one more thing: Sodomy is the only sin for which God came down from heaven to destroy. Though God dealt with many other sins in various ways, there is no other for which he came down from heaven to verify and destroy. In the New Testament, sodomy is declared to be �against nature.� And of the men, Paul in Romans 1 says they leave �the natural use of the woman....� In effect, there is no greater sin against God than to reject how he made you, and no greater sin against women than to reject how God made them. .........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.frontiersman.com/articles/2009/05/27/faith/doc4a1b794bd0fd9907394285.txt