Has bush finally explained how they will come over ...

[butterfly77]

here and get us, in detail.If they are coming aren't, some already here since he let four years go by without doing anything about it. So are we to believe that if he kills all iraqis,insurgents,al qaeda then the soldiers can leave.These repugs are some really stupid people if they really believe that this can be done. What makes this situation so bad is that everyone knows that bush doesn't know anything about war or planning.

I really don't see how anyone could call these people the grownup party. They are playing games with the soldiers,Iraqis and us as americans. These are the most childish and incompetent people who are running this country. We cannot leave out Cheney, I believe that they like him because he looks so menacing.They fail to realize that he knows nothing about war but something he may have read in a book, he was so scared of war that he got five deferments. I guess they told bush he better bone up on his reading so now he thinks that he is a war president.

By the way,didn't they send the military to Iraq to save the Iraqis... Has anyone reported yet that the republicons are planning to give up on bush's non plan in August so, the repugs have a timetable,deadline. Doesn't this mean they micromanaging the war.

[The Count]

1. Anyone who boasts "humility" like W does - is a walking joke...

"grown-ups" "tough on National Security" (unless you use the right meaning of "tough on"), "personal responsibility" - all shall become jokes. Forever.
I remember in 2001 when W invented Officegate...the only true part of it was probably the disappearance of the "W" keys...I remember predicting then that, just like Hitler got the swastika removed from the runic alphabet, W may do the same for his letter...
I feel I was close...

[Old and In the Way]

2. That question should be asked to Bush and every administration official.

Expose the absurdity of the rationale.

[butterfly77]

3. At every press conference ...

and they should not speak in nuances, they should speak plainly to this ...

[uppityperson]

4. if my son was sacrificed as flypaper, I'd be even more angry.

"We are fighting them there so they don't come here." How is this preventing them from coming here? Who is the "they" that cannot come here? Aren't some of "them" already here, already us? Does it mean that "they" will all flock to "there" to fight instead? This means our soldiers are being sacrificed as flypaper, right? Attracting them there rather than here? Rhetorical questions to ask the impaired next time they give you one of these bs lines.

Sorry for all the quotes, but it just needs to be done.