|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
mullard12ax7 (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 08:05 PM Original message |
Now that Cheney is a blatant traitor, what excuses for not prosecuting are there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. I'm guessing complicitness and spinelessness are among the top 5 reasons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillieW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. One reason I read is that it would interfere and distract from Obama's agenda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pleah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 11:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
21. I've heard that one, too, and it is BS, imo. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
3. The tried and true "good faith" defense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
4. Not enough Recs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mullard12ax7 (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 09:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. It won't get recs, it's not about MJ or un-recs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:35 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Why was Impeachment Off The Table? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 11:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Hush now. We must not go there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 11:31 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. The past is the future. Same lame reasons for not impeaching Nixon, Reagan/Bush, Bush/Cheney.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 12:06 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. This nation cannot survive without remedying the past mistakes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 12:07 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. They are there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 12:10 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. And, they wear many hats... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 06:04 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. Of course now, we can impeach Clinton for lying about a blow job... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 11:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. That must be it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gordianot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
6. No excuses, is it possible the programs have not been dismantled? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
7. i bet cheney has a file on every person in congress & all the possible judges he may face |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
travelingtypist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
8. The one I heard today that beat all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. truth is, if we don't prosecute, we're no better than a banana republic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
travelingtypist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:32 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I can't remember if it was a GOP mouthpiece or a "objective" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
10. DLCers might get kicked out of "The Family". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
11. Time to look forward? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. It comes to one: EMPIRE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
15. Because it's merely a "policy" difference, which the traitor was merely "wrong" about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InkAddict (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
16. Why, it would tear the country apart.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greybnk48 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
17. No excuses. If you're wealthy in America and in the "right" social circle, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ControlledDemolition (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
18. Even Benedict Annold was well intentioned! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humanahumana (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
23. he's part of the protected class... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gimama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
24. AskDOJ@usdoj.gov |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC