Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Banks Gone Wild! Now Wells Fargo sues... itself!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 09:28 PM
Original message
Banks Gone Wild! Now Wells Fargo sues... itself!
I visit another "forum", where it's news for nerds.... well I like the site.

I think it should be posted here too: though the article they reference comes from Faux Business...

http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/al-lewis-wells-fargo-bank-sues/

Basically it goes like this: Condominium defaults on its mortgage payments, the condo has a 1st & 2nd mortgage, both issued by Wells Fargo. Lawyers administering the 1st mortgage sue all lienholders - i.e. itself on the 2nd. Wells Fargo has retained lawyers for both mortgages and filed suit as Wells Fargo vs Wells Fargo.

Isn't this absolutely stupid? Congratulations guys, this is your bailout money at work!

Mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. A lien against itself cannot stand!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nope, they have to do this.
If Wells holds the first and second, the lien in first priority must name the inferior interest to wipe it out. The paper COULD change hands, and amending the Complaint midstream would be dumb.

Additionally, if the property goes to a third party bidder at the sale, any funds over the final judgment may go to remaining creditors, ie the 2nd loan. Erego, they stand to get funds.

At least, this is the case in Florida.

The style is actually going to be Wells Fargo v Owners, Owners' unknown spouse/co-tenant, Wells Fargo, Condo Assn, Any other lien holder(s), and unknown tenants in possession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
transeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Jarndyce v. Jarndyce?
It's been a long time since I revisited this story, but aren't the lawyers in Dickens' "Bleak House" simply perpetuating a lawsuit to perpetuate a lawsuit and drain the coffers of the Jarndyce fortune? Seems apt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC