Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Soldier: Obama not U.S. born, can't send me to Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:15 AM
Original message
Soldier: Obama not U.S. born, can't send me to Afghanistan

Related Content
Commentary: Time to get over Obama birth rumor
By Lily Gordon
Macon Ledger-Enquirer

MACON — U.S. Army Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook is seeking a federal court order to stall and eventually prevent an upcoming deployment to Afghanistan.

In the 20-page document — filed July 8 with the United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia — Cook's California-based attorney, Orly Taitz, asks the court to consider granting his client's request based upon Cook's belief that President Barrack Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States and is therefore ineligible to serve as commander-in-chief of U.S Armed Forces.

Cook further states he "would be acting in violation of international law by engaging in military actions outside the United States under this President’s command, and that Plaintiff would thus be simultaneously unable to perform his duties in good Rule 65(b) Application for Temporary Restraining Order 22 conscience and yet be simultaneously subjecting himself to possible prosecution as a war criminal by the faithful execution of these duties."

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/1139969.html

If Maj. Cook refuses to deploy, court martial the little fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. I defer to your sig. line. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, dear, teh stupid. It hurts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. I need to know a little more about his background before I can
either criticize him or defend him.

I mean on one hand, who can blame these soldiers for trying to get away with any batshit crazy reason to come home?

Has he been stop lossed multiple times in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Maybe he's even liberal just trying to come up with anything to get out of a hellish situation.

On paper, I don't approve of his bullshit charge, but maybe even he doesn't believe it and he's simply desperate. I don't know.

Don't you need more facts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I have enough facts.
Maybe I should have presented more in the OP. His attorney is crazy fuckwad Orly Taitz. I've read the bastard's affadavit and he's as gung ho to go and kill Muslims as any bigoted, bloodthirsty christofascist could be. He's also a racist nut as his affadavit makes clear. So, no, I don't need more facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
30. Ok cool....I didn't know that from reading the Miami Herald story as
I'm unfamiliar with the affadavit. I would therefore agree with your OP having read your update.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Read what the guy himself wrote.
Easy to find...he's a certifiable bat-shit nut job conspiracy theorist birfer of the highest order.

I don't quite think he's rational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. He's aFreeper
Literally, he's a Freeper and joined the batshit insane Orly Taitz in their racist birther bullshit.

He should be dishonorably dishcarged for being a white supremecist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:55 AM
Original message
Disagree .. he either reports as ordered or arrested as a deserter ... Obama is CIC, 'nuff said
Any given order that is not directly contestable as an illegal order (kill an unarmed civilian or (used to be) torture a prisoner) is to be obeyed, then brought to issue later. That's the way it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
42. Sorry, but desertion doesn't kick in until 30 days AWOL
That would be August 14.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #42
86. That's not quite correct
It's 30 days, or when you have compelling evidence that the member intends to desert.

I'd say we have all we need to Court Martial the little Freeper fuckwad. This is definitely not conduct "becoming" an officer in the military, and the guy would be one you wouldn't want serving next to you. This shit cannot be tolerated in the military. He has an easy way out. Just drop your "effing" resignation papers and walk away. If he's a Major, I'm pretty sure he's completed his required obligated service. Hopefully, he doesn't have 20 in yet so he won't qualify for retirement.

If he does qualify for retirement, I'd prosecute the fuck out of him to ensure he loses all pay and entitlements. Let him see if the Freepers will finacially support his ass.

The American people sure as hell shouldn't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #86
105. Realistically it would be missing a movement (or whatever the Army version of that is)
That was what all our guys who didn't ship back in 2003 got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
34. I don't need any facts to call his excuse ignorant or bogus
I'm not judging him on whether he wants to avoid Afghanistan but on his argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. See Post 30
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wonder if he'd have a problem with
a president who was born in say, Panama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. c'mon - it was on a military installation - same as U.S. soil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. actually, no, he wasn't born on a U.S. base
although of course he is a eligible to be President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. born here -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coco_Solo

A U.S. military installation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milspec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #26
79. So he was born in 1936 in a hospital built in 1941???
United States Senator John McCain was born in 1936 at a Navy hospital<1> at Coco Solo Naval Air Station.<2>

Coco Solo Hospital was constructed in the summer of 1941. The area containing it was transferred from the civil part of the Panama Canal Zone to the naval part when Franklin Roosevelt signed Executive Order 8981 on December 17, 1941.<3>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #79
81. from the fact checker
"the McCain campaign has declined to publicly release the senator's birth certificate. But a senior campaign official showed me a copy of his birth certificate issued by the "family hospital" in the Coco Solo submarine base. (McCain's grandfather commanded the Coco Solo Naval Air Station in 1936; his father was the executive officer of a submarine based in Coco Solo.)

"The birth certificate was signed by Captain W. L. Irvine. I have now checked that name against the Naval Register for 1936, and I find that William Lorne Irvine was director of the medical facility at the submarine base hospital in Coco Solo, Panama Canal Zone, during that time period. You can see the entry here. I think this effectively disposes of any remaining doubts that McCain was born inside the Canal Zone."


http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/05/john_mccains_birthplace.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
77. Other way around. Of course, he was born on a U.S. military
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 09:33 AM by No Elephants
installation, but, no, we can't be sure he is eligible to be President because the SCOTUS has not yey definitively interpreted the meaning of the words "natural born citizen."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. someone remind this asshole who his commander in chief is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. weren't the sympathies just the opposite during the bush administration
Weren't there a significant number here on DU that sympathized with those that did not want to serve in Iraq or Afghanistan?

The reasons of course were often family obligations etc, however, the request to no be deployed was still the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. he does want to serve. this has absolutely fucking nothing to do with not wanting to serve
he's a fuckwad birther and he's in cahoots with the insane dentist/lawyer, Orly Taitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. I did not say he did not want to serve - I said he did not want to serve in Iraq or Afghanistan
"stall and eventually prevent an upcoming deployment to Afghanistan."

Pretty clear - he does not want to serve in Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. let me try and clarify this. Cook has no problem going to Afghanistan or Iraq
you are flat wrong. he is all about challenging Obama's legitimacy as president. Read his affadavit- it's easily found by googling. this really isn't rocket science, doc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. this clarifies it a bit - what they are attempting to do
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103626

(sure hate to say World Net Daily clarifies anything - but it did make his intentions clearer to me)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
56. If he wants out, he should just say he wants out.
This is just fucking grandstanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
63. The people we support give legitimate reasons
such as illegal orders or stop loss orders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. illegal orders? Not sure what constitutes an illegal order.
And I would also have to argue in general that the military needs a stop-loss option. Sure - it can be misused, but in general, it is necessary.

There were several arguing that due to family issues, they should not be shipped to the war zone. How do you feel about those? Seems there was a lot of sympathy for those in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #64
65. An illegal order is any that is against the law.
If you think there were none, I don't what to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #65
68. oh Good Lord
an example please - one that is relevant to the discussion at hand - where a military member asked to be relieved of a deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan based on the illegality of the order.

I do not remember any such case posted on DU. Obviously I do not remember them all so there certainly could have been some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #68
69. Some examples? Sure.
Torturing prisoners.
Killing prisoners.
Bombing hospitals.
Turning male members of fleeing civilians back into a bombing zone.
Use of "shake and bake" on civilian populations.

Need anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #69
73. we are discussing orders pertaining to a deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #73
83. And these were the reasons some gave
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 09:48 AM by mmonk
for refusing to be redeployed. Comparing this as the same as the refusing deployment based on the bogus stuff about Obama is not equal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #83
87. so there was nothing illegal about the order sending them to Iraq or Afghanistan
rather orders they received while there prior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #87
90. I personally think those orders illegal as well
but it will be a hard argument to make in this country that doesn't understand the supreme war crime noted in the Nuremberg Principles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
78. Many DUers lionized every soldier who deserted or refused to go to Iraq under Bush
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 09:36 AM by slackmaster
Yes, there is some inconsistency among some of us.

Not me. As a member of a multi-generation Navy family, I regard all deserters as equally vile.

If you don't want to serve, don't volunteer for military service. I don't buy his lame excuse of questioning Obama's place of birth. The simplest explanation is that the guy is simply a coward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tan Gent Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #78
91. I must have missed something here, why can't he just resign his commission?
Or maybe should ask why -doesn't- he...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #91
92. A tour of duty is for a fixed period of time
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 11:00 AM by slackmaster
You can't just walk out of the military. He's committed to serve until it's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tan Gent Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #92
95. But he's a Major. Surely he's completed the minimum obligation...??
He should be able to resign from active duty even if he's still stuck with the IRR.
I don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #95
103. An officer can submit a resignation, but the service does not have to accept it
And if they accept it, it takes months to process. Unless you have some compelling personal reason like a physical health problem, it's not going to look good on your record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tan Gent Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #103
113. Okay, my only experience with that sort of thing was 30 years ago
one of my friends in the USAF, a Captain, was waiting for a security clearance and the OSI uncovered
some information about him. He resigned his commission on Monday and he was out by Wednesday.
I drove him to personnel to do the paperwork. Obviously it was an unusual situation...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #78
94. I am one. I come from a family with a distinguished list of vets.
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 11:15 AM by mmonk
The reason was I knew the reasons given were deliberate misinformation and dishonest for committing our nation to war with Iraq. Therefore, I viewed it as a misuse of our armed forces personnel. That shouldn't be compared nor seen as "equal" with something as ludricous as the Obama not being a natural born citizen canard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #94
102. It looks to me like you are buying one set of excuses because you happen to agree with...
...their stated reasons for refusing to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
89. You know, maybe some did
But as an active duty member who served under Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush II and now Obama...there are standards and rules for the military, and there are consequences to violating those rules.

I firmly believe that the reason our nation has been able to survive as long as it has, is partly due to the fact that we have civilian control of the military, and the military must remain apolitical. It's one small reason I am so opposed to the "wingnuts" who believe that the Constitution and the military only belongs to them!

Fuck 'em! If you are in the military, and you don't want to serve, then GET THE HELL OUT!!!!

Getting out may be painful, depending on how you do it, but if you're convictions are that strong. If you really feel that you can't serve....then GET THE FUCK OUT!!!!

It's not a Fucking Social Club! It's the Fucking United States Military!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #89
108. I certainly tend to agree with you
I carry a retired ID. The military is a place where you either do what you are told (for the greater good) or you get out of the way (leave the military). Not following orders may carry the extreme penalty - folks losing their lives. That was one of the biggest problems I had with junior - his thought that he did not have to follow orders to report to a duty station.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #108
114. Yes
but in a larger sense, it is more than just about following orders. We can have an entire thread about what constitutes a "lawful" order, and the processes involved if you feel you've been given an "unlawful" order.

Whether this POS likes it or not, President Obama is...President, properly elected, certified and sworn. Therefore, he is also this POS' Commander-in-Chief.

He either deploys as ordered, or he gets a Court Martial, where, IMHO, he should lose all pay and benefits.

We simply can't have this type of cancer infecting the military.

And take my word for it. This guy, no matter if he was serving under Bush or Obama,...is a disease that must be removed from the military
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. This is just another tack to bring the birth cerificate issue up
in court. If anybody was illegitimate, it was Junior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
70. It's about deposing Obama
The birth certificate issue and eligibility issue are means to that (they hope). You're right, they will try it any which way they can get away with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. OK, if you don't want Obama to send you there
How about they send you to the stockade at Ft. Leavenworth instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. And I assume this soldier would be pulling on the leash to go to Afghanistan if * were his CIC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. ding, ding, ding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
14. Did he have a problems with a *president
who couldn't pass the required drug test and skipped out (AWOL) on the rest of his TANG enlistment during Viet Nam while 65,000 of his fellow Americans died including quite a few of my friends. Did the little fuck have a problem with that one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. He's a Freeper
Literally, he posted on Free Republic all the way up until he joined the batshit insane Orly Taitz on this conspiracy nuttery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
32. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
17. Say hi to all the boys at the stockade for me, Major.
Dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snake in the grass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #17
51. That would be Private Cook.
Hope he enjoys pounding big rocks into little rocks at Ft. Lost in the Woods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
18. Here's the bestt bit about this racist batshit insane loon
He's required to deploy on July 15, but his court date is July 16. If he doesn't deploy, he could end up doing time because no fucking way any military court lets him off on deploying as lawfully ordered to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. har har. hope he ends up locked up by the end of the week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #18
43. Agreed ... fail to report and you better show up with a missing limb or in a coma
otherwise you get what is now called a "time out period" and you get the opportunity to rebuild your rank from the lowest level.

This asshole is an officer, a Major.

Read "Every Man a Tiger", the best of the military got out during the Vietnam war ... that left the barrel bottom worst NCOs and officers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
21. I see they're still handing out "stupid pills".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
24. Hell, if he doesn't want to go to Af, fine. It's a mad, bad place.
He could have picked far less painful ways -- shoot off his knee caps, get a butt ugly face tattoo, swan around post in a tutu, pee on his commander's desk.

After the SJA Great Whites get done laughing, they'll have his liver on a pole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. um, he does want to go to Afghanistan. This is simply about
challenging Obama's legitimacy as president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #25
33. Uh huh.
Any one who's been in service long enough to make O-4 and pulls this stunt wants out or is suicidally stupid. There's no other option here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #33
38. he's a birther. a true believer.
and that means he's delusionally insane on the subject of Obama. Why isn't that an option?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #38
49. He suddenly became a birther about the same time as his turn
in the meat grinder orders were cut? This stinks of shirking and delectation of duty. No argument about insanity; however, where was his righteous stand when the House counted the electoral votes and declared Obama POTUS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. you should do a little more research before spouting off.
read about it then get back to me. it couldn't be clearer that this is all about the birther thing and nothing to do with his not wanting to go to Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #50
53. When you can't answer the question, default to ad hominem. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. there was no personal attack on you.
I simply suggested that you do some research before commenting. You are wrong. period. google the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #53
58. here.
Plaintiff Major Stefan Frederick Cook is not a pacifist. He does not object to war or the use of military force in the implementation of national policy or the enforcement of international law. Above all, Plaintiff is not a coward, he is not engaged in mutiny, sedition, insubordination, contempt, disrespect, or any kind of resistance to any general or specific lawful order of which he knows or has received notice. Plaintiff Major Stefan Frederick Cook realizes and accepts as a matter of political reality (although it is very hard for him to bear personally) that many may criticize or even shun him, saying that he is not acting in the best interests of his country for trying to uphold the plain letter of the Constitution. Others may cynically ridicule this Plaintiff when, as an officer responsible not only to obey those above him but to protect those under his command, he comes to this Court asking for the right to establish the legality of orders received not only for his own protection, but for the protection of all enlisted men and women who depend on HIS judgment that the orders he follows are legal. Above all, when Plaintiff Major Stefan Frederick Cook submits and contends that he files and will prosecute this lawsuit and seeks an injunction or temporary restraining order against the enforcement of potentially illegal orders for the benefit of all servicemen and women and for the benefit all officers in all branches of the U.S. Military, he knows that those in power illegitimately may seek to injure his career. He knows that he risks all and he does so in the conscientious belief that he does so for not merely his own, but the general good. But Plaintiff cannot escape from the mandates of his conscience and his awareness, his educated consciousness, that all military personnel but especially commissioned officers have an obligation and a duty to only obey Lawful orders and indeed have an obligation to disobey Unlawful orders, including orders by the president that do not comply with the UCMJ. The moral and legal obligation is to the U.S. Constitution and not to those who would issue unlawful orders, especially if those orders are in direct violation of the Constitution and the UCMJ.

NEVER BEFORE IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

Plaintiff presents the key question in this case as one of first impression, never before decided in the history of the United States: Is an officer entitled to refuse orders on grounds of conscientious objection to the legitimate constitutional authority of the current de facto Commander-in-Chief? In the alternative, is an officer entitled to a judicial stay of the enforcement of facially valid military orders where that officer can show evidence that the chain-of-command from the commander-in-chief is tainted by illegal activity? ..."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/17266905/05311066823
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
28. His legal team is as crazy as he is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
29. And he got as far in rank as Major being this ignorant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
strategery blunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
31. OMG, read the comments
for a sample of true freeper wingnuttery! It's almost like the birther lawyer is posting on behalf of his client in the comments section! :puke:

Click on the link to Ledger-enquirer for true freeper firing squad. Teh stupid... :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
36. You signed on the dotted line.. This is your Commander and Chief..
You do not get to pick and choose which President you listen to..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #36
59. How dare he question the President in a Time of War!
Isn't that what these idiots would be spouting if someone had pulled this in 2001 because they did not think * was lawfully appointed President? Plenty of people and probably plenty of military personnel had doubts back then, but they went ahead and followed their orders. But people were labeled traitors or unAmerican for simply questioning the advisability of the President's actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. Oh Yeah.. and our summer soldier here.. seems to forget ..Guantanamo
Bay has been a military prison for just such for over 40 years..My uncle spent time in Guantanamo in the 60's for going AWOL..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
39. i swear!! the people perpetrating this bullshit should be brought up on charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
40. Bush was not legally elected to office ...
so, can all the families of the dead soldiers sue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
41. if hes been stop lossed over and over
I dont care what reasons he gives to get out of it.
this occupation is , was, and always will be bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. For the twelfth time in this thread, THE FUCKHEAD HAS NO PROBLEM GOING
He's a fucking birther. HE's using the fact he was being deployed to question his CIC, which means he's going to fucking jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #41
48. uh, this has jackshit to do with that. the pig would love to go kill Aghanis and Iraqis,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #48
55. thats sad. but the upside is that if he ends up in the brig
which he will , he wont be able to go over there and do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
45. According to Modern Ghana...
Obama was born on the African continent:


...snip...

For Ghana, Obama's visit will be a celebration of another milestone in African history as it hosts the first-ever African-American President on this presidential visit to the continent of his birth.

...snip...

http://www.modernghana.com/news/226379/1/history-beckons-as-prez-obama-arrives-tomorrow.html


The "Birthers" eat this stuff up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
46. execute him for treason
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
47. Agree court martial is appropriate and let SCOTUS' courts rule on the issue. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueMTexpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
52. What you said! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
57. one word, chickenshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
60. To borrow from Obi-wan Kenobi
Who's the bigger fool? The fool or the fool that follows him? Some idiot actually took a losing case? Count this as FAIL! :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #60
62. actually, orly nutcase, has filed suit after birther suit, and she recruited this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
66. If he's so afraid why can't he just say he's gay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
67. The RW equivalent of "He wasn't really elected...."
As is usual when comparing liberals and conservatives, the liberal argument that Bush wasn't really president because he wasn't lawfully elected is based on real facts while the RW just makes shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
71. This is a case in which the unrec is a huge fail. DU should know about these loonies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #71
75. DU does know about these loonies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #75
93. So you think it should be un-recommended and not newsworthy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #93
96. Nope.
How'd you get that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #96
99. The way you said that DU already knew about these loonies
gave me the impression that the thread didn't deserve to be recommended. Sorry for my assumption. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #99
100. I read it again. You're right.
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 12:03 PM by Iggo
My bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
72. Hawaii is not part of the U.S.?
I think I need a new map then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
74. Fucking birthers.
"Let me see a birth certificate!"

"Okay. Here you go."

"No. Not that one. The REEEEEAAALLLL one!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
76. Why is this thread being un-recced?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #76
116. I'm guessing it's because I authored it
though the recs beat out the unrecs in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
80. Enjoy your court-martial, Major.
Barack Obama's your CIC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
82. DU lawyers: answer me this because I have no idea
Don't lawyers have to pass the bar in a certain state in order to practice there?

Do some states recognize membership in one state's bar association, in another?

How does this work?

Just wondering, because this batshit crazy lawyer is from CA and seems to be running to and fro filing frivolous lawsuits all over the country.

I know all of my questions might be totally naive, hence the request for some knowledge/experience sharing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #82
84. This is federal, different standards apply
That said, Taitz has not been admitted to practice in this District.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue For You Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
85. "Stefan"...is that French?
Has Cook's birth certificate been doctored? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
88. This asshole, IMO, has become the definition of "totally fucking stupid." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
97. Sure he can, but he'd be better off sending you to the brig.
Bigotry isn't one of the values which gets you conscientious objector status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
98. Some people still don't believe it. What does it take to prove it to them...
And even when shown, will they believe it anyway?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
101. The UCMJ is pretty clear on this. Major Cook has a GCM in his future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
104. These birthers are the nuttiest of the GOP fruitcakes.
And that's saying a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
106. the more i think about this
the more i think this nutter is staging all this to 'reconsider' at the last second, or he was never going to be deployed to Afghanistan in the first place...i don't care how crazy he is; even he knows he's facing certain jail time over a dead issue so he must have left himself an out somewhere...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #106
109. It's not about deployment
That's just an excuse, you're right. They want Obama to have to prove his legitimacy and (they pray to God) be expelled from office when he can't; which they are convinced he can't do. They're nuts, but they know what they're doing, inasmuch as they will do ANYTHING to depose Obama. The nutter Cook is only a bit player, but he is a true Birther. It's the whole pack of dogs, the Birthers, the American Grand Jury, the Teabaggers, the white supremacists, the Sovereign Citizens, secessionists, and the like -- they are doing the staging and they are all working together. Cook is a reservist, it's not like it's his career on the line, so he does his bit for the cause.

This is his page on FreeRepublic, I understand, where he posts as roaddog727:

We would not be here today save for the second amendment and a strong military.

Army Reserve Officer (MAJ)/DOD Contractor. Spent 19 months in Kuwait from February 2002 through September 2003 as a Defense Contractor providing IT support to CFLCC HQ. Also served as a reservist (mostly not on active duty) in Kuwait. Mobilized in support of the Global War on Terror in the SOUTHCOM AOR from Aug 2005-Jul 2007. br />
Combat Engineer - Faciendum est

BS Economics, St. John's University 1983.
MBA Finance & Quantitative Analysis, Fordham University GBA 1986.
MS Total Quality Management (TQM), Anna Maria College 1996.

CCNA, CCDA, MCSA, CCNP, CCDP, CCDE(Qual), ITIL foundations, NSO L2, (Quintessential IT GEEK)


Staunch Republican and defender of the faith.


http://www.freerepublic.com/~roaddog727/


It's sketchy, but doesn't look like much of a military "career" he's sacrificing. It looks like he was a defense contractor to start with and was later mobilized as a reservist in 2005. I don't know more of his bio, but if this is what he's presenting to Freepers as military creds, it's not much.

He seems to think of himself as a warrior, though, a warrior for the right wing:

roaddog727

Situational awareness – in the real world as well as the blogosphere is key and critical to winning the war of information and countering the pusillanimous propaganda put out by the likes of the MSM and other “threat” outlets.

Read our blogs – read their blogs and as SUN TSU said, “Know your Enemy”.

With that knowledge at hand, we can collectively counter the threat much more effectively by setting things right and raising the BS flag.


http://cannoneerno4.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/what-can-you-do/

From other posts I've seen he buys a lot of guns and stuff personally, not relying on the Army to arm him.

It's war, okay, but not in Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #109
111. oh, he's a reservist...
that explains a lot....

still, i'm happy that these folks want to dump this much time, energy, money and manpower into a dead issue -- let them keep ranting on fringe wingnut sites, searching the ends of the earth for nonexistent evidence, filing 'unabomber legalese' briefs with the courts, circulating astroturf e-mails as stated fact, and let them keep dreaming about a day that will never come... Keep dangling that carrot on a stick in front of them, and hopefully they will still be in court 20 years from now trying to retroactively nullify Obama+Biden's 16 years...shit, if anything we should be encouraging them -- toss out a few manufactured crumbs to keep them on a trail and make them think they are making progress...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
107. Sounds like he is too stupid to be a soldier - nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
110. 2 things spring to mind
1. Can't see any court (military or otherwise) condoning a soldiers actions with regards to what orders they'll agree to what they won't, and from whom and who not those originate.

2. I'd like to hear from all of those that think soldiers can do no wrong, EVER, because they willingly and often stand in harms way unquestioningly, unflinchingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
112. I prefer a section 8 for this nut...
that would send a message to all the fundie right wing tea bagging morons out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
115. Court Martial ASAP!
He's a jerk.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC