Does anyone remember what the excuse was that Bush* could not testify without Cheney?

[Winterblues]

It was during that mockery they called a 9-11 investigation. Bush* was called to testify and he would not do so unless Cheney was with him and their testimony could not be public or transcribed or under oath..Is there any precedent at all for something like that?

[Gidney N Cloyd]

1. Precedent? Sure:

[MineralMan]

2. The Explanation:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_TvDzGuSPTho/RhekdsjSj7I/AAAAAAAAAC4/0wEa0a5sBJg/s400/Cheney+Bush+puppet.gif

[Winterblues]

3. I believe this question is quite embarrassing for Republicans.

It is very difficult to justify such behavior even by the most right wing radical..

[ellenfl]

4. because he needed cheney's hand up his butt?

oops! didn't see the prior posts! great minds, and all that. :hippie:

ellen fl

[damntexdem]

5. The same principle by which a dummy cannot perform without a ventriloquist?

No, simpler: the principle by which GOPers are above the law. Yeah, that's it.