Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An Exit Strategy for Obama in Afghanistan; Taliban 'Code of Conduct'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 03:15 PM
Original message
An Exit Strategy for Obama in Afghanistan; Taliban 'Code of Conduct'

Source: Christian Science Monitor

An exit strategy for Obama in Afghanistan

With American support for the war in Afghanistan slipping, President Obama may be tempted to implement an easy exit strategy before next year's fall elections for Congress.

What might that strategy be? Negotiated deals with different Taliban leaders that would splinter their followers.


But it's a peace path with potential potholes.

The idea gained traction this week after a reported truce between a Taliban group in Badghis Province and the Afghan government of President Hamid Karzai. (The main Taliban spokesman denied the deal.)

In addition, the British foreign secretary, David Miliband‚ gave a speech that laid out a strategy to "fragment the various elements of the insurgency, and turn those who can be reconciled to live within the Afghan constitution."

For both the United States and Britain, July has been the deadliest month for troop casualties since the 2001 US-led invasion ousted Al Qaeda and drove the Taliban from power. Leaders in both Western countries face new pressures to end their involvement in the conflict.

Not wanting to define the terms of a US "victory" in Afghanistan, Mr. Obama says the main goal is simply preventing Al Qaeda from operating there again. Many in the Taliban, who have had an uneasy relationship with Al Qaeda, may agree with him.

As Richard Holbrooke, Obama's chief envoy to the region, told the BBC: "There is room in Afghan society for all those fighting with the Taliban who renounce Al Qaeda and its extremist allies, who lay down their arms, and who participate in the political life of the country."

What is also helping drive the idea of making deals with the Taliban is the Aug. 20 election in Afghanistan for president and provincial council members. Large crowds are turning out for many of the 39 candidates. (President Karzai appears the favorite to win.)

Taliban leaders lack popularity among Afghans because of their ruthless rule during the 1990s. And despite their recent military successes against NATO troops, the election only showcases their political weakness. Many among the Taliban may be tempted to eventually join the democratic process in hopes of regaining power – in a similar way that Sunni insurgents did in Iraq, which caused that war to ebb in 2007.

more: http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0728/p08s02-comv.html


The Taliban are reacting to this possible strategy:

Source:: Military.com

Taliban Adopts a 'Code of Conduct'

CAIRO -- Afghanistan's Taliban pledged to limit suicide attacks in newly-issued code of conduct for its militants.

"Suicide attacks should be used only at high and important targets ... Utmost efforts should be made to avoid civilian casualties," says a book, "The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan Rules for Mujahideen," a copy of which was acquired Monday by the pan-Arab al-Jazeera TV.

The book, with 13 chapters and 67 articles, lays out rules that govern the movement fighters and differentiates between what they are allowed and not allowed to do.

While the Taliban have repeatedly resorted to suicide bombings across Afghanistan, the books talks of limiting suicide attacks, avoiding casualties among civilians and working to win the battle for the hearts of the local civilian population.

The book also forbids the formation of any new militias or armed groups and calls for disbanding any group that refuses to join the main structure of the movement.

Mullah Omar, the group leader, was quoted in the book as saying that "If unofficial groups or irregular battalions refuse to join the formal structure, they should be disbanded."


Meanwhile, the book gives the full autonomy and freedom for provincial rulers to decide operations they need to conduct and how to run the territories under their control.

more: http://www.military.com/news/article/taliban-adopt-a-code-of-conduct.html?col=1186032310810
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. We'll be in Afghanistan in 2012.
Make of it what you will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We'll be in Afghanistan in 2016 and 2020.
No end in sight...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. They'll get health care in 2017.
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Depends on our objectives
If we really plan on conquering the place we'll be there until we give up. If we merely plan to try and stabilize the situation so that we don't have to worry about the militants taking over neighboring Pakistan and its nukes well then I don't think we'll be there in 2020, although it's certainly possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You believe in the possibility of Afghanistan containment?
Impressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Well, I'm not optimistic, to say the least, but I'm hopeful
I also know that if Pakistan and its nukes fall to the Taliban there will be a President (insert Republican here) in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Peace with honor?" Same bullshit, different colonial war.
Too bad about the dead and those still to die to cover politicians' and generals' asses for PR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. I wonder if legalizing or decriminalizing drugs here at home would aid
the U.S. in that conflict?

I would imagine we wouldn't have any reason to destroy their primary cash crop of Opium Poppies, and in turn the Karzai government would have more resources to rebuild their nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC