Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone care to make sense of this?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 10:47 PM
Original message
Anyone care to make sense of this?
Edited on Sat Jan-27-07 10:52 PM by cynatnite
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said yesterday that he was working to accelerate the deployment of 21,500 additional U.S. troops to Iraq, suggesting that the influx of American troops is no longer contingent upon the Iraqi government fulfilling its commitments for Baghdad security operations.

snip:
"As long as he feels he needs them, they're all going to flow," Gates told reporters at his first Pentagon news conference.

snip:
"We are going to see if the timetable for the dispatch of the brigades can be accelerated," Gates said,

snip:
The U.S. troop increases now underway in both Iraq and Afghanistan reflect a deliberate effort to "create an environment in which the commanders feel open to requesting what they think they need," Gates said, suggesting that in the past U.S. commanders have not felt comfortable asking for reinforcements.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/26/AR2007012601208.html

Gates is saying that it doesn't matter whether the Iraqi government follows through even though bush stated they have to or else.

Some of this reads like they'll send even more troops to Iraq. The last one is even more surprising. Basically, Gates implied the commanders didn't feel they could ask for what they needed despite bush's statements to the contrary. It further shows how little attention was paid to the military commanders on the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who knows. Bush lies all the time.
I guess I will joke and say never get mixed up with an ex-drunk who is also a zealot and has the same types around him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. These people are sick. I heard on cspan today where recruits are being
given only 2 weeks training before being sent to Iraq. I think it was when I watched the peace march rally.
2 weeks training! They are walking to their deaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. that has to be bs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. New recruits into the military....
They get about 9-12 weeks of training depending on the branch and their MOS. The two weeks...possible that those currently in the military, but never having been to a war zone are getting two weeks of training to help better prepare them.

You can rest assured new recruits into the military aren't getting only two weeks of training and then going to Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Can we rest assured? I would have until this administration.

So many standards have been lowered that I for one am left wondering.

Secondary thought: it would be awful if that "2 week" comment at the rally today was hyperbole. I think Tim Robbins said it??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. They wouldn't lower them to that point for new recruits...
Just won't happen. I'm a vet and I guarantee you it wouldn't happen. It would be nice to see the complete quote in context and who it was from. Might help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. it confirms that the "commanders on the ground" were afraid asking for
more troops and god knows what else from Bush was going to be a career ender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting the use of the word flow . . .
. . . as in flowing blood. Sick fucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unperson Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. That second part implies this current surge will open the floodgate.
15,000 in four months, another 30,000 here, 40,000 there. Endless war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. That cold breeze is whistling
right through my study tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. kicking for the day crowd n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC