Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nate Silver: On Health Care, Who's Hooked on Special Interest Money?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 08:14 AM
Original message
Nate Silver: On Health Care, Who's Hooked on Special Interest Money?
(From June but just as valid today, if not more so)

Based on data collected from http://opensecrets.org">OpenSecrets.org, I've tallied the amount of contributions that each of the 99 current senators have received from Political Action Committees -- PACs -- from the health care industry since 1989. This includes PACs associated with pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, HMOs, health services companies, medical supply companies and physicians', dentists' and nurses' groups. It does not include any money collected from individual contributors -- only money collected from PACs.

For comparison, we've provided the overall amount of federal campaign funds each Senator has collected over the same period from all sources -- including PACs, individual contributions, and self-financing. The senators are ranked by the percentage of their overall bankrolls that they've received from health industry PACs; the top 10 follows below. We've also listed each senator's http://standwithdrdean.com/where_congress_stands">position on the http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/06/health_care_reform_for_beginne_3.html">public option -- a government-run health care policy that would be established to compete with private policies -- which vigorously supported by progressives and many health care wonks but is generally opposed by industry groups.




http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/06/on-health-care-whos-hooked-on-special.html">More

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlurker Donating Member (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. 38 Yes, 21 ???
59 Total Senators are either Yes or ??? WE need at least 12 ??? to turn to Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lifelong Protester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. good information
I appreciate all of you folks out there who find this stuff and post here for those of us who 'one stop shop' for our information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC