Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 02:02 AM
Original message
"Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest?"
http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/becket.htm

<snip>
Seeing the writing on the wall, Becket fled to France where he remained in exile for six years. The two former friends appeared to resolve their dispute in 1170 when King Henry and Becket met in Normandy. On November 30, Becket crossed the Channel returning to his post at Canterbury. Earlier, while in France, Becket had excomunicated the Bishops of London and Salisbury for their support of the king. Now, Becket remained steadfast in his refusal to absolve the bishops. This news threw King Henry (still in France) into a rage in which he was purported to shout: "What sluggards, what cowards have I brought up in my court, who care nothing for their allegiance to their lord. Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest."

The king's exact words have been lost to history but his outrage inspired four knights to sail to England to rid the realm of this annoying prelate. They arrived at Canterbury during the afternoon of December 29 and immediately searched for the Archbishop. Becket fled to the Cathedral where a service was in progress. The knights found him at the altar, drew their swords and began hacking at their victim finally splitting his skull.

<snip>


And now we have right-wing assholes decrying Obama as the "greatest threat to America", comparing him to Hitler, saying that he must be stopped at all costs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just a few weeks ago I went to mass at the site where St. Thomas was martyred.
Edited on Thu Aug-13-09 02:12 AM by QC
The cathedral has changed so little that even the heavy oak door at the site of the martyrdom is the same one that the knights entered in 1170.

It's an amazing place--words fail me on this one.

And I do agree that the fascist establishment in this country is trying to pull off the same trick now. It's ugly, and pointless, because they already own our government. There's no need for bloodshed, just a quick yank on the leash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's bad enough we have to think he is hobbled. These threats are beyond belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Mere control is not enough for these people. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KatyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Isn't Canterbury an awesome place?
We used to live up the road a bit from there (well, 30ish miles) and went fairly regularly. My favorite place in all England, methinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. It really is amazing, my favorite place in England. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. I have no idea what your quote is suppose to match.
First off people in any discussion are not royalty. People in government or arguing against policies are not priests or royalty. And when people start calling themselves lords it is just funny.

You have a part in bold, but not sure who you think should be rid of, who you think the knights are, or the prelate.

Anyway, what does your quote mean?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. If you're not familiar with the story, click on my link in the OP
It's a historical anecdote, one that relates to what's going on today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Could you explain it more, which sides do you mean.
In my interpretation the quads are not a problem, they have been handled. Although that's a metaphor also. (Although much of economics in the story my metaphor comes from I disagree with, the writers bias seeps in in many points. Unfortunately some non relevant biases are required to get through many publishing filters. They have a different feel so can be differentiated from other parts of the story.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. When Big Money interests, today's royalty...
...run networks that whisper to us, "socialist," "Kenyan" and "terrorist" when referring to an upstart champion of high-minded principle, and they do it in order to enrich themselves, all the while denying that they are begging for an assassination, I think the comparison is apt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Don't forget the whole "he is not a legitimate president" meme
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Yeah, that "Kenyan" thing.
While I don't really believe that the networks, or even Beck, are trying to motivate an assassin, I think they bear plenty of responsibility for the violence. This is a power struggle, and a politically-neutralized President Obama is worth more to them than a martyred one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. When Beck makes jokes about killing Nancy Pelosi, it's hard to tell
Sure, he says he doesn't want his followers to commit violence. But then he continues to demagogue Democrats, telling his listeners that they are the greatest threat the US has ever faced, jokes about killing them, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Ok I get it, that is what I thought it might be.
But the metaphor is not accurate because your metaphor continues forward to something that has not happened. Like I said, in my belief the quads are stopped, so it will not happen.

That was the problem with the metaphor, it may be true that they are trying to stir up anger, but the rest of the metaphor does not fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. This is a cautionary tale more than it's a metaphor for anything that's happened yet.
I don't believe that Big Money really wants to drive a lone gunman to assassinate anybody. Their goal is to stir up enough hate to stop reform, and the creation of pro-reform martyrs would detract from their success.

They want political neutralization rather than blood. And they sure as hell don't care about the lives of those they incense; those folks are expendable, and could be useful martyrs in the cause of halting reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's a metaphor, dear.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I understand it is a metaphor, but it requires me to figure out what
each noun means, and in his metaphor I did not want to interpret his meaning and actually get my meaning, I was curious about his meaning. But I did not know his meaning since I did not find enough indication of his meaning in his post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. It's one of those things
that you either "get," or you just don't. In this case, the OP is exactly right, and right on target.

Perhaps in order to get it, you could try to apply it to Bill O'Reilly & Co.'s rants against specific doctors whom they call "baby murderers" on air. Think of what has happened to those doctors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Or whenever a freeper type says Obama must be stopped
Even if the person saying it doesn't necessarily mean killing him, someone else might take it to mean just that and attempt to do it. The OP is a historical example of just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Does the expression "Plausible deniability" mean anything to you?
The king never told anyone to kill Becket. He merely asked a question. Was it his fault if somebody misunderstood?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. I can't recall.
I think Tim Russert told me once, but I cannot say for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. In the case of Republicans, I think it's more like
deniable plausibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Someone in a position of authority makes an ambiguous comment
People who admire, respect, fear, or who are just ornery, interpret the comment to their liking, and go off and kill someone. Their excuse is they were just following orders of the authority figure. The authority figure can now say that he never really meant for anyone to kill anyone else, and other people who admire, respect, fear or who are just craven, stick up for the authority figure and say, "Yeah, Glenn Beck never actually told anyone to take a pot shot at the president; he just said the president was the greatest threat our nation has ever seen." And gullible folks will absolve the authority figure of all culpability, even though it's pretty obvious that by goading a suggestible group of the population something bad will almost surely happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. Rec'd: the most convincing so far of the
free-speech-calling-for-assassination-is-bad-posts.

Personally, I'd appreciate more clarity re- existing law on this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. Talkshow words do become actions!
That Hutu talk-show host in "Hotel Rwanda" urging the extermination of "cock-a-roaches" (Tutsis), resulting in massacres of hundreds of thousands of Tutsis and moderate Hutus is evidence of the power of media over minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. There's a good fictionalized account of this in Pillars of the Earth
which I just finished reading, so your post is timely (for me anyway)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
16. Profound Hugabear
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. Those who ignore this warning in all reality secretly wish for history to be repeated..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
28. He WAS a meddlesome priest.
Edited on Thu Aug-13-09 06:13 PM by TexasObserver
I have no sympathies toward the Roman Catholic Church of medieval times, and their legions of vile, corrupt clergymen. More, not fewer, should have have put to the sword.


Yes, I get your suggestion of the implication for the right wingers who are basically calling for someone to stop Obama from doing the things he's doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
29. You just gave me a chill.
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
30. Damn that Obama for acting all Christ like and shit...
Wanting to heal the sick, feed the hungry, clothe the cold, shelter the homeless, and comfort the huddled masses...

What a dick.

Oh, wait... isn't that what we're supposed to do?

I must be confused. If not me, someone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
31. Perfect reference. Scarey, but right on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 13th 2024, 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC