Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Concerned Women for America waving a pistol at ENDA. Literally

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 12:15 PM
Original message
Concerned Women for America waving a pistol at ENDA. Literally
Concerned Women for America have posted a deranged article on ENDA written by their former lead "concerned woman", Robert Knight. They only have the kindest of intentions and the most Christian of thoughts about gays. No really! Don't believe me? Just look at the image they used to promote the article. No, that isn't a dog whistle for violence against gays, nooo, uh uh.



Meanwhile, the promoters of Referendum 71 in Washington state, which trumpeted the CWA as a major endorser, ran crying "Intimidation! Threats!" as an excuse to try to keep the signers of their public petitions secret and to refuse to divulge the names of their campaign donors as required by law. This of course after they found so many unintimidated people to sign the petition that they had enough signatures to submit to the state.

Hey if you'd like a peek into the mind of the insane, read Knight's article. It's supposed to be an article about ENDA, but somehow it's really about marriage...or Ozzy Osbourne...or something. Skip the theocratic appetizers:

To put it more simply, a statute that directly contradicts God's moral law is illegitimate.

and go straight to the crazy-brain candy.

Societies that lose respect for marriage eventually lose creative energy derived from the delayed gratification that strengthens families. Instead, people strive for immediate, sensory pleasure, and societies become less dynamic and fertile. Government grows bigger to pick up the pieces and create grounds for even greater hegemony.

Our very survival is at stake, not just our economic well-being. When a spirited crowd rightly puts the screws to our rulers over their financial profligacy, someone needs to ask them as well why they're serving as crew members on cultural bombers piloted by Pelosi, Obama and Kennedy.

Robert, didn't your English teacher ever tell you that if you mix too many colorful metaphors, you end up with muddy-brown prose?

http://www.pamshouseblend.com/diary/12470/concerned-women-for-america-waving-a-pistol-at-enda-literally
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. "their former lead "concerned woman", Robert Knight"
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Another common misuse of the word "literally."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. this title made me think, and probably nothing to do with thread. women carrying guns
speaking of that man wearing weapon and declaring all of us should be armed. wonder how these guys would feel if women actively and in mass started wearing guns, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wouldn't that be "figuratively"? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I guess but that was the title so that is what I posted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. ...
:woohoo: 'Societies that lose respect for marriage eventually lose creative energy derived from the delayed gratification that strengthens families. Instead, people strive for immediate, sensory pleasure, and societies become less dynamic and fertile. Government grows bigger to pick up the pieces and create grounds for even greater hegemony.'

they've discovered another piece of The Gay Agenda -- the Loss of Creative Energy!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 13th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC