Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Life Expectancy and Infant Mortality around the world.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 05:20 PM
Original message
Life Expectancy and Infant Mortality around the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Scandinavian babies doing very well - old folks, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. French, German, Italian, Australian and Japanese ones too.
All better than the United States. Hmmmm.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Learning Nomad Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You do know that they report infant mortality differently
What is an infant mortality in the US is often not considered an infant mortality in these other countries. That's because they can often be saved in the US but not in the other countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Link? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Learning Nomad Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Link, per your request
The United States counts all births as live if they show any sign of life, regardless of prematurity or size. This includes what many other countries report as stillbirths. In Austria and Germany, fetal weight must be at least 500 grams (1 pound) to count as a live birth; in other parts of Europe, such as Switzerland, the fetus must be at least 30 centimeters (12 inches) long. In Belgium and France, births at less than 26 weeks of pregnancy are registered as lifeless. And some countries don't reliably register babies who die within the first 24 hours of birth. Thus, the United States is sure to report higher infant mortality rates. For this very reason, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which collects the European numbers, warns of head-to-head comparisons by country."

http://health.usnews.com/usnews/health/articles/060924/2healy.htm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Page not found! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Learning Nomad Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. my bad! New link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. This is just dissembling.
There are no numbers. How many babies are we talking about that are categorized differently? What percentage is that? What are the outcomes?

But more to the point: why are we in competition with Cuba, a bunch of godless communists in a pre-indistrial nation, for the better infant mortality rate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Learning Nomad Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Umm, we aren't in competition with anyone.
I'm simply pointing out that the OP's position is untenable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. It is your position that is untenable.
if you want to argue that the numbers are not strictly comparable, that there are category differences, fine. It you want to imply that means we are better than the numbers show, you need to show how.

If there is no competition, why are you here trying to say it's not so bad? I for one am embarrassed by the fact that Cuba shows better infant mortality statistics than we do. If that does not embarass you, that is your business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Learning Nomad Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Sorry that the facts don't support your position
Can't help that you won't look at them objectively just because it doesn't support your position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. You have provided no facts.
You are not the arbiter of objectivity either. Enjoy your blinkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. Think about what you just provided as proof
of our birth mortality rate actually being higher than other countries...this is proving that we have to count dead babies as being alive i.e. stillborn etc. So that makes it worse than reported...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. No. I don't know.
Where did you obtain this "knowledge?"

Also, if more infants can be saved in the US, wouldn't that lead to LOWER mortality rates? Moreover, when these countries don't report a dead infant as infant mortality, what do they call it? :shrug:

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Learning Nomad Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. See the above link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. The article is very general.
It talks about factors that could weigh in the US favor. Funny, there are no factors going the other way. And numbers by the AEI? Are you kidding? Do you think pre-natal care is superfluous?

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. That doesn't seem to make sense.
Really, I'm trying to follow your logic, and it's making my brain hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Learning Nomad Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. See the above link
Sorry if the facts don't meet your ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-15-09 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. Funny how the losers of WWII and so many other countries devastated thereby
now have universal health care, lower infant mortality, and greater life expectancy than the victorious USA which was spared the devastation suffered in so much of the world, but a funny thing happened on the way to the forum: spineless Dems have let 'pukes mostly set public policy these last 60 years so that we now spend about as much on national defense, with 5% of the world's population, as the rest of the world, while the uber well-to-do surely enjoy the lowest tax rates in the industrialized world. But take heart, we have been tough on communism, surely killing many more millions of people on their own soil as the rest of the world combined since WWII, we are tough on crime, tough on drugs, and have the highest incarceration rate imaginable. I could rant on and on, but surely all have gotten the drift. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
16. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
17. Geez...Do you think they report life expectancy differently too?
United States - 6.4 / 78.0

Countries from the link in the OP that have Universal Health Care:

Infant Mortality / Life Expectancy

Austria - 4.5 / 79.2
Australia - 4.6 / 80.6
Canada - 4.6 / 80.3
Denmark - 4.5 / 78.0
Finland - 3.5 / 78.7
France - 4.2 / 79.9
Germany - 4.1 / 79.0
Greece - 5.3 / 79.4
Hungary - 8.2 / 72.9
Ireland - 5.2 / 77.9
Italy - 5.7 / 79.9
Japan - 3.2 / 81.4
New Zealand - 5.7 / 79.0
Norway - 3.6 / 79.7
Poland - 7.1 / 75.2
Portugal - 4.9 / 77.9
Spain - 4.3 / 79.8
Sweden - 2.8 / 80.6
Switzerland 4.3 / 80.6
United Kingdom - 5.0 / 78.7

http://alessonaday.wordpress.com/2007/06/19/sicko-list-of-commie-pinko-countries-with-universal-health-care-socialized-medicine/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Learning Nomad Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I dunno. Do they? Is it relevant?
I am simply pointing out that the OP's post was BS. That's pretty much undisputed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Why was it BS? All he did was post a link...
You took it from there.

And yeah, I think life expectancy rates are relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Undisputed?
If you don't count all the posts that are disputing you. :crazy:

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. LOL! "undisputed"???
Ummm, "I do not think it means what you think it means."

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 13th 2024, 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC