Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Facts Collected Here --What Are The Connections? What does it Mean?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 11:43 AM
Original message
Facts Collected Here --What Are The Connections? What does it Mean?
FACTS: (provable from multiple reliable sources)
1. Domenici's Office gives a 'no comment' response when asked about the Albuquerque Journal story?
2. White House announces undetermined number of White House Staff emails 'mishandled' on RNC servers.
3. White House offers to allow WHite House Officials interviews with Congressional Investigatory Committees, behind closed doors, no written transcripts, not under oath, and according to their agenda --take it or leave it offer.
4. President Bush admits he had conversations passing on complaints about US Attorneys to Gonzales.
5. Monica Goodlin, DOJ Liasion with the White House, had stated her intention to invoke her 5th Amendment Privilege and will refuse to testify before Congressional Committees.
6. Sampson has testified under oath that Gonzales was involved by attending meetings and seeing documents regarding the firing, and that he 'signed off' on the firings.
7. Some emails have references to Karl Rove.
8. Now Gonzales is blaming Harriett Miers for the firings.
9. Gonzales gave 122 replies of 'I don't recall' in earlier testimony under oath before Congress.
10. Gonzales has given at least three(3) different versions of his involvement with the firings.

Connections: (factually provable)

1. Domenici's non-denial means he was directly involved in the firing of Iglesias.
2. Bush was directly involved with the people who influenced the firing of Iglesias.
3. Gonzales was directly involved with Goodlin and Sampson in the firing of US Attorneys.
4. Sampson was closest to Gonzales and he contradicted the sworn testimony of Gonzales.


What Does it Mean? (Speculation)
1. In all likelihood the emails that Congress is onto contain incriminating information about 'other scandals' than the US Attorney firing scandal. Thus, the desire to control the interviews of White House Officials disclosures to the Congressional Committees.

2. The 5th Amendment privilege invocation by Goodlin's counsel in all likelihood involves matters other than the US Attorney firing scandal.

3. Karl Rove likely orchestrated the entire political firing operation through cutouts.

4. If the emails on the RNC servers were to be recovered, the full extent of Karl Rove's politicization of many Government Agencies would be revealed.

ADD TO THE LIST....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. self-delete
Edited on Mon Apr-16-07 11:51 AM by valerief
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. What does it mean? For the Bushistas, it means ...
(1) business as usual; and hopefully,
(2) impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gonzo is still a year behind the truth:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC