Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's why a Republican won NJ governor...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:02 AM
Original message
Here's why a Republican won NJ governor...
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 08:06 AM by Postman
A plethora of low-information voters live in NJ.

Property taxes are always an issue in NJ - very high. How a Governor can affect that short of mandating a major regionalization of schools and raising taxes on corporations and businesses is a challenge.

Apparently voters in NJ think that can happen by a voting in a Republican who promises lower taxes and better services. Sounds like the Ronald Reagan model - cut taxes for everyone but specifically for the wealthy and then borrow to pay for gov't services.

Another factor in a Republican winning the Governorship is the lame-ass Obama Administration. No Single-Payer Option for health care, retaining right-wing economic advisors that helped drive the country into a ditch, No jobs, Unemployment rising, no end in sight in Iraq and pondering an escalation in Afghnistan.......Gee I wonder why folks weren't fired up to run out and vote for Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. mstly i think it was a referendum on corzine himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. BINGO!!! He's been unpopular since his first day in office. He
struggled to close a budget gap, and the seniors didn't get their usually large property tax rebates this year. They did get something, but it wasn't as much as they usually get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Democrat lost other races last night
My local area which has been trending democrat for years in the suburbs swung back to republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. See this ---
Another factor in a Republican winning the Governorship is the lame-ass Obama Administration. No Single-Payer Option for health care, retaining right-wing economic advisors that helped drive the country into a ditch, No jobs, Unemployment rising, no end in sight in Iraq and pondering an escalation in Afghnistan.......Gee I wonder why folks weren't fired up to run out and vote for Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I know that
however other's won't see it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebass1271 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I see that. I said that last night on DU
and pretty much everyone ignored me. i think we need to write to the house. Rahm or P. Obama. We need to let them know how the sentiment is outthere. These ppl once they win, they go into a freaking bubble and can't see what's going on.
We are tired of P. Obama's non-response attitude towards HCR. We are tired of leaders not taking a strong stand against the blue democrats whom are standing against reform. WE are tired of Liberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Dems tend not to turn out in off year elections
And off, off years are even worse.
I think losing the two governor's races was more due to low turnout and local issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. That may very well be but.....
the "local issues" are driven somewhat by the "national issues"....if you don't have a job and you see the powers that be in DC moving at the speed of glaciers to solve problems .... that has consequences as well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Obama has zero to do with Corzine losing. Corzine was destined
for one term long before NJers ever heard of Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Maybe, maybe not...
Obama made an appearance in NJ on Corzine's behalf right before the election.

Had the Obama Administration and the Democratic majority in Congress been aggressive and progressive in their policies maybe the influence of Obama appearing, backed by his progressive agenda (which hasn't materialized), would have been enough to fire up Democrats to keep the ball rolling.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. As I've stated. Corzine has been popular for many years. The voters..
wanted to punish him and they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Yikes!! Correction. Corzine HAS NOT been popular...etc...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. true. But every sitting governor has a target on their back right now
We just happen to have more governors by a long shot.
I don't agree that Obama has been luke warm. That is in great degree to obstruction by Repugs especially in the Senate.
But the perception is that the Obama admin is going slow. This is fed and fed and fed by our shitty M$M. Perception in this country is so much more important than reality.
Also remember that Deeds ran away from Obama, so it is really hard to blame that on Obama.

I think that the results in New York's 23rd and California's 10th district more of a measure on the views of America on the Dems. Both were won by Dems. NY23 for the first time in 150 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. You lost it at the end...
thinking Obama has anything to to do with Joisey politix.

And thinking "single-payer" is high on the agenda in a state where the largest industry is pharmaceuticals.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. The Single-Payer issue....
A Progressive measure if there ever were one that has not been embraced by the Democratic Party. Single-Payer is by far the most cost-effective form of health reform yet that message never makes the MSM and thus is lost on the majority of voters in NJ.

So yeah, maybe you're right in that it wasn't as big a factor in how NJ voters decided the race but it may be an indicator of why soo many Democrats stayed home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Democrats stayed home because they're too poor to turn out for off-year elections.
This is always, always the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. They're too poor to turn out for off-year elections but they're not too poor for general elections?
It may be true about how political party's fare in off-year elections but I'm thinking that trend may have been thwarted had a truly Progressive Agenda been implemeted in DC which might have translated to successful elections for Governor....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yeah, they are.
Especially in this economy, if it's between going to work and bringing home money or voting in a kinda, sorta, not really monumental election, you're going to work. There is no agenda that could've driven out more people in 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. I don't agree fully but somewhat ...
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 09:05 AM by Postman
I still think a Progressive Agenda could have played a roll in getting people to the polls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebass1271 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. That has nothing to do with being poor. it is putting your
priorities straight. Besides, voting is until 7:00. ppl could have gone to vote after work. The reality is, that ppl don't vote on off elections. You have to be very well organized to gotv and make a difference, just like repukes were yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebass1271 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. Dems stayed home because there weas not a GOTV effort
period. DNC chairman is sleeping at the wheel. If he continues, 2010 won't be that pretty either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. To be fair to Kaine, he's still Governor.
Not sure why they selected him knowing that, but it's not fair to say he's asleep at the wheel when he was only expected to be a part-time Chairman at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebass1271 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. well, now that he won't have the job of governor, hopefully
he will bring his ass to work and hard, cuz dems, progressives and liberals are prett much pissed off at the lack of leadership in our party, and that goes for all, Obama, Reid and somewhat Pelosi..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. Bullshit on Obama - he's got a 54% approval rating among the voters there.
Don't be Tom DeLay - we didn't lose because we "weren't liberal enough." We lost because times are friggin tough and we can't change things fast enough for a low-turnout electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Okay.
Times are tough - as you say, and you're correct.

What is being done about it from DC?

The Stimulus was too small. Unemployment is still rising. Where are the jobs?

We need an FDR not a warmed over Bill Clinton.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Do you know how long it took FDR to turn things around?
Here's a hint - it was a lot longer than 10 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. To prove a point...
Average rate of unemployment
in 1929: 3.2%
in 1930: 8.9%
in 1931: 16.3%
in 1932: 24.1% <---- FDR elected
in 1933: 24.9%
in 1934: 21.7%
in 1935: 20.1%
in 1936: 16.9%
in 1937: 14.3%
in 1938: 19.0%
in 1939: 17.2%3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. He didn't take office until March 1933
notice unemployment went steadily down after that....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Notice that unemployment was at its peak in the year he took office.
Unless you think things were so utterly bad from January-March that it skewed the entire year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebass1271 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #16
28. You think stimulous was too small and right wing repukes
think the stimulus was too big of a government hand out. Itn's this the reason why indies are piss at Obama too?

I am confused now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Craftsman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
22. According to exit pols in NJ the top 2 concerns were taxes and the economy
The rep promised to lower the property taxes (in NJ they are the highest in the country)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. When people are desperate they believe anyone who will tell them what they want to hear..
Property taxes ARE high in NJ. But how does the Gov of the state affect local property taxes, the majority of the bill being school taxes?

Rebates? That money has to come from somewhere.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
30. Dems sat on their hands, period. I live here. NO ONE I know who voted in 2008 cared
and that's the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. While voting in urban Essex County... A poll worker in a very AA
neighborhood that is considered a Democratic stronghold told me that a lot of voters were coming in and talking "stupid." Her words. IOW, voters in that district were pissed and being that they are all black and Obama supporters it had zero to due with Obama, and more to do with property taxes and the loss of the annual homestead rebates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
32. My whole family lives in NJ
I grew up there. Lots of friends still live there. So, I know a little about their POV

Honestly? I think that the property taxes is a big issue. But it's also the rampant corruption and being sick of the constant budget crises. Many of them were sick of the status quo. While I don't think Christie will do ANYTHING at all and people will be voting to make a change again during the next gubernatorial election... I think it was more a statement about the mess of Jersey politics than anything else. And I don't think this makes any statement at all about Obama. It's about the mess of a state that Jersey is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. You hit the nail on the head. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reverend_Smitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Exactly...
as a NJ resident, taxes and the state budget mess were the deciding factors in the election. Obama has an approval rating in the high 50's and Corzine is somewhere around 35%, yet he still managed to pull in 45% of the vote. Voter turnout was tepid, even compared to 2005, people didn't like either candidate and most people stayed home. This has very little to do with Obama, yet the RW will try to spin it that way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC