Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Civilian Reserve = Occupation Government?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SanCristobal Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 11:50 PM
Original message
Civilian Reserve = Occupation Government?
There are (or were, 5 days ago) a lot of threads questioning whether or not the Civilian Reserve Bush proposed in the State of the Union is an attempt to establish some sort of mercenary force. After reading the State Dept. draft proposal (http://proceedings.ndia.org/6100/russell.pdf) I do not believe this is in any way what the Civilian Reserve is intended to do. I believe it is an attempt to create a readily available occupation government, something much like the Coalition Provisional Authority during the first year of the Iraq war.

The proposal calls for the enlistment of both the kind of specialists that made up the CPA and the kind they often found themselves without. The vast majority of the Civilian Reserve jobs to be filled are not military (although it does call for 600 police) but urban planing jobs and the like. Many of the jobs can specifically be linked to problems the CPA had trouble dealing with.

This raises a few questions that I don't think anyone is asking. First, while I support this idea on some "be prepared" level, I do wonder about the need for a permanent occupation government on standby. This should not be the kind of thing a nation should find itself in frequent need for. Second, the Civilian Reserve would not be fully ready until at least a year after Bush leaves office. My (and I'm sure many others) gut reaction is to see this as a Bush/neocon play to leave the necessary tools in place for when their next ideological ally is elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SanCristobal Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kicking,
because like I said, no one is talking about this and I think they should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. And to think, I thought it was something less sinister, like a BushAmerican
version of the Hitler Youth. Recommended #1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SanCristobal Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. No one else has a problem with institutionalizing an occupation gov. on standby?
Read the draft proposal, I'm convinced I'm right about this interpretation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. C.O.G. (they're at it again)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush and his nazi's can go to hell
Blackwater and others are just a new face on the same old klan. These are the same whackos that used run around the Ozark mtns in Arkansas in the 80's. White supremacist "survivalists". Losers. When the money dries up they will disappear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC