Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary launches Attack against Obama and Edwards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 07:50 PM
Original message
Hillary launches Attack against Obama and Edwards
Hillary's camp released a memo to a bunch of reporters stating that Both Obama and Edwards campaigns are stalled or falling just as questions regarding her high negatives were being asked.

Funny how Obama sends out a classy note regarding Clinton's campaign Saturday and she is just about attack.

Here is the story: thread from Raw Story:

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-ushill0122,0,2285023,print.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onecent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. If they are gonna start this early with the negative attacks against their
own -- I'm turning off the news channels earlier than I expected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Oh, I already have!
I can't stand that shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's going to be a long campaign season, and I just don't feel anybody represents the poor
Dennis Kucinich's policies are more to my liking. At least John Edwards bothers talking about poverty in America. I was told the "conventional wisdom" is that we talk about the middle class instead of the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. How about both
of them? The very Poor and the Middleclass are getting the short shift in bush's corporatefascist America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. It's sad but the people who could benefit most from the political
system are too busy working just to survive to take part in it!

"conventional wisdom" might be right but it sucks big time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Psst--a little advice---
Edited on Mon Jan-22-07 08:12 PM by rocknation

ATTACK THE RETHUGS, HIL!


Or at least wait a few more weeks--their campaigns aren't much older than yours. Can't you tell that such a statement isn't even rational? You're directly quoted as mentioning Kerry's campaign--you seem to be sharing his inability to tell when you're getting obviously bad advice.

:eyes:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durtee librul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Her approach will be to divide and conquer
that's all....no sustance to the lady....buy her a one way ticket back to the Senate where she belongs and can do the most good.

She better thank her lucky stars that Obama and Edwards are gentlemen and won't bring up Whitewater or Vince Foster or a host of other 'malfeasance' issues she has buried in HER back yard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. Whitewater? Vince Foster?
so, you believe the rightwing when they bring up these topics- even though she has been investigated up and down about the issues and not found liable in any way?

Enjoy your stay...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hillary also praised Obama on Katie Couric tonight
It's a campaign; pollsters do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is there really a necessity for going negative this early in the game?
Personally, I'd rather they never went negative at all, especially in the primaries, because it just makes the repuke's job easier in the general election.

And I'm wondering how many of these attacks that are alledged (I'm thinking of the Obama school story now)really did come from Hillary Clinton and not from Karl Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. If that aricle constitutes going negative, hold onto your horses!
"And I'm wondering how many of these attacks that are alledged (I'm thinking of the Obama school story now)really did come from Hillary Clinton and not from Karl Rove."

C'mon now, you believe the Moonies on that one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. excellent points well made :-) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. Did you read the article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Let's face it there worried about Edwards and Obama
Edwards leads in Iowa and Obama lead in NH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yeah, this is going to be ugly
and I have a feeling it will mostly be coming from Hilly. I just can't picture Obama going negative and I don't remember Edwards being negative except maybe with the rethugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:02 PM
Original message
It's not a repug story. It originally came from Raw Story and HRC's own
staff were being open about it. Passing out the memo and talking to reporters about this.
It's true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktlyon Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. You didn't think she would play hardball?
she will take no prisoners, she can never appear weak in anyway. This would be true of any women running for pres today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. This isn't playing hardball. This is making sand castles.
Edited on Mon Jan-22-07 08:16 PM by rocknation
If they want her to look strong and tough, the Hillary camp should go after the real enemy--Bush and his Rethugs.

:headbang:
rocknation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. READ the article.
SHE does no such thing.

If you really squench your eyes up tight and tilt your head a bit to the right - you just MIGHT be able to think that possibly the guy speaking could remotely be "attacking". But only if you really want to believe that.

jeesh.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. LMAO. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. If you think that was an attack...
You must not be that old...

If you want to see attacks, hop into the way back machine to early 1992...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. I am gonna put Hillary on IGNORE
cause I can't take 2 years of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. A Newsday piece of trash hit on Hillary
If you read the actual quotes all Hillary's people are doing is calling attention to a poll that was very favorable to her, and pointing out that the other candidates aren't as well tested. Those are both points in Hillary's favor which are well within fair play.

Newsweek twisted the whole thing to make it look like a savage attack.

Here's how Newsweek put it:

"Obama isn't tough enough to withstand GOP attacks in 2008."

Here's what was really said:

"Some of the commentators look at the ratings of people who have not yet been in the cross-fire, and say they might have a better chance. Recent history shows the opposite."

This kind of RW hit piece trash is coming out a mile a minute right now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'm going to keep the whole bunch on ignore until big Al anounces his candidacy
then I will just ignore them all some more. I'm hanging in there for the the big man myself :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
22. Where in the article did SHE attack them?
nice bullshit headline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I think they posted a link to the wrong article. I don't see no stinking attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. OK you are crackin me up. ATTACK...Where? Did you post the right link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
24. he's smooth as baby diarrhea
she is politics as usual.
too bad shit sticks and causes the stuck to stink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
28. Somebody is going to be thrown under the campaign bus
get the popcorn ready, the shows about to start
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
29. your headline is misleading
that's no attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC