cheney would have had them in gitmo by now, and declared them enemy combatants
-----------------------------
Michaele and Tareq Salahi, the infamous couple who crashed President Barack Obama's state dinner last Tuesday, are shopping their story to the networks and hoping to nab six figures for the interview. An anonymous television executive told the Associated Press that representatives for the Virginia couple have contacted networks urging them to "get their bids in" for an interview. (The couple has since denied the allegations, but since we live in the age of Heidi and Spencer, it's best to take their word with a grain of salt.)
Is it just us, or is this whole scenario wrong on so many levels? For one thing, network news divisions generally don't pay for interviews, although they've been known to pay for exclusive materials like pictures or videos. So it's not going to look good for whichever network ends up doing the interview.
Aside from that, it just seems wrong that anyone who's breached a state dinner, sneaking past the Secret Service and putting the President in harm's way, should be paid for an interview. We realize that national security broke down somewhere along the way, but that doesn't negate the fact that this couple should be in jail or at least slapped with a hefty fine.
http://insidetv.aol.com/2009/11/29/white-house-gatecrashers-shopping-story-to-networks/?icid=main|main|dl2|link2|http%3A%2F%2Finsidetv.aol.com%2F2009%2F11%2F29%2Fwhite-house-gatecrashers-shopping-story-to-networks%2F