Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Afghan Oil Pipeline Given Go Ahead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 01:01 PM
Original message
Afghan Oil Pipeline Given Go Ahead
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/2017044.stm

Trans-Afghan Pipeline Vital Statistics
Description: 48-inch (4-feet) conduit for natural gas from Turkmenistan with option to run a parallel oil pipeline for oil from Kazakhstan and northern Afghanistan

Capacity: 30 billion cubic meters of natural gas per annum; oil flow to be determined

Route: 950 miles from Turkmen-Afghan border north of Herat southeast to Arabia Sea at Garadar, Pakistan

Cost to Oil Consortium: $1.9 to $2.7 billion (estimated)

Cost to U.S. and Allied Taxpayers: $4.5 to 6.5 billion for infrastructure and humanitarian assistance to maintain security within Afghanistan

Construction Period: 2003 to 2007

Total Net Profits: $1 to 1.5 billion per annum

Afghanistan Profits (Transit Fees): 8 percent, or $100 to $300 million per year

Projected Ownership: Unocal Corporation-led consortium for 30 years, then reverts to Islamic State of Afghanistan

Project History: Originally conceived by Bridas Corporation (Argentina) in 1993, which dropped out in 1996 when Unocal established relationship with new Taliban government. Promoted by Unocal until 1998 missile strikes against Al Qaeda. Dormant until 2001. Revived either prior to or immediately at start of U.S. bombing campaign in October 2001. Memorandum of Understanding signed May 30, 2002 in Islamabad between Turkmenistan, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Formal financing not yet arranged






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oooh, goody! I recall Louis Farrakhan ranting about this almost 7 years ago...
Edited on Tue Dec-01-09 01:10 PM by Deja Q
What's he going to say now?

:party:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are 30,000 troops the price to be paid for this pipeline?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. This story is from 2002--
Edited on Tue Dec-01-09 01:05 PM by librechik
got me going there, tho
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes..old news... the project is behind schedule..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. I checked the date too
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Spice Melange must flow...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can we just get that fucking thing built so we can get out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. no. cuz once it's built we have to protect it from sabotage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hmm... Construction period: 2003-2007
How'd that work out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Great for Bushco
The pipeline work continued while US attention was diverted to Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. There is no pipeline.
None. Nada. No pipeline. Nobody is going to build a pipeline through the middle of that insane war zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I beg to differ.
"It turns out that, in April, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India (acronymically TAPI) signed a Gas Pipeline Framework Agreement to build a U.S.-backed $7.6 billion pipeline. It would, of course, bypass Iran and new energy giant Russia, carrying Turkmeni natural gas and oil to Pakistan and India. Construction would, theoretically, begin in 2010. Put the emphasis on "theoretically," because the pipeline is, once again, to run straight through Kandahar and so directly into the heartland of the Taliban insurgency."

Source:
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion/335023

also see current threads about this:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7125995

more details of cost, etc.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7124568
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. They can talk about it all they want.
The Taliban will blow it up and kill anyone associated with it. It's not going to happen any time soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think everyone is aware of this
and Karzai's relationship to Unocal. Why would we need to invade Afghanistan for the pipeline when the Taliban agreed to let us build it? It would make more sense to, oh yeah, take our eye off of Afghanistan and turn some other country into the bad guys; exactly what Bushco did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. A better route would be southwest across Iran to the Straits of Hormuz
Maybe the Chinese will build it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. Speculations of more recent (these are from 2008) about "2010."
Edited on Tue Dec-01-09 01:36 PM by chill_wind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. knr nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. and away we go
follow the money, honey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
18. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC