|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:11 AM Original message |
Your thoughts on this mystery man I confronted and photographed in DC this weekend: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
1. Kicking to expose this guy. For what it's worth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I'll kick for the nazi scum too. Photograph this! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EdwardM
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
140. Do you have to call him nazi scum? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wednesdays
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #140 |
144. Then why the secrecy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EdwardM
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #144 |
149. I don't know the facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dorian Gray
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 03:22 PM Response to Reply #140 |
178. I also immediately thought Reporter... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duppers
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #140 |
202. did you not read this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 06:16 PM Response to Reply #202 |
216. Duppers gets it. He admitted his position with that statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duppers
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 09:25 PM Response to Reply #216 |
245. absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EdwardM
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 08:19 PM Response to Reply #202 |
239. If someone came and shoved a sign in my face |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #239 |
265. If someone put a sign in my face, I'd easily waltz around them... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dorian Gray
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 12:46 PM Response to Reply #202 |
345. I did read it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 02:24 AM Response to Reply #140 |
295. Reporter, sure. Hence his response: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. good luck. I remember being photographed at a few rallies in DC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:46 AM Response to Reply #9 |
57. I saw the snipers on top of the WH last yr. That WAS scary. Eerie. It felt very wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:58 PM Response to Reply #57 |
143. The snipers go wherever the Pretzeldent goes. (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scriptor Ignotus
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #57 |
163. those guys are always up there -eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 12:30 AM Response to Reply #57 |
278. I was at a protest in NJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 08:35 PM Response to Reply #278 |
337. Good for you for making an appearance! You may have made an impact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unperson
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #9 |
76. At the Conyers/Downing Street memo rally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #76 |
177. It is their job, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vanboggie
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 10:30 PM Response to Reply #177 |
256. Then by rights they should be with Gore and Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
motocicleta
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 10:38 PM Response to Reply #256 |
259. you might want to edit that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vanboggie
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:19 AM Response to Reply #259 |
339. AHH!! - I meant Gore and KERRY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
motocicleta
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 06:04 AM Response to Reply #339 |
341. May we all get a good long rest from the madness soon. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
2. Kick and recommend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Umbram
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
4. Careful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. I have no intention of getting in trouble. I'll delete if someone thinks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:18 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. chill. photos of the protestors are all over the web |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CabalPowered
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. He's standing in a public street. How could this be illegal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. if he is on a public street, photographing him is not illegal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:19 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. I actually said "I'm going to take your picture." and he said "Go Ahead". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I haven't accused him of anything other than what he was doing! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CabalPowered
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:20 AM Original message |
Exactly. You have nothing to worry about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:40 AM Response to Reply #8 |
49. It could be argued that it might be illegal to expose a military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #49 |
145. Call up Valerie Plame and ask her. (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 12:45 AM Response to Reply #49 |
280. You too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 08:24 AM Response to Reply #49 |
307. The problem here is that MI operatives don't LOOK like MI operatives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
21. bullshit. and if anyone did all the more reason to be outraged n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Umbram
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:27 AM Response to Reply #21 |
35. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:30 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. thanks. i am in a state of constant pissed about this, lol. miami, oregon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
22. what, posting those same pictures, pictures of the same guy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:27 AM Response to Reply #4 |
34. Aw, c'mon, it's a good picture of you, don't be shy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CabalPowered
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #34 |
50. LOL! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:43 AM Response to Reply #34 |
52. Ha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shakespeare
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
169. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Umbram
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 03:25 PM Response to Reply #169 |
179. Ok. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shakespeare
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 09:05 AM Response to Reply #179 |
309. That's not legal advice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
133724
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:24 AM Response to Reply #4 |
299. public place; public picture.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
6. Former (or current) Marine junior officer. Probably DIA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:21 AM Response to Reply #6 |
23. or from the Gap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:22 AM Response to Reply #6 |
26. Blackwater? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 09:31 PM Response to Reply #26 |
247. Blackwater is a private entity, I believe (not military). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
84. I don't think it's MI (JMO).. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:30 PM Response to Reply #84 |
89. You can imagine all the things I wish I'd said! Like "Did you get that sweater at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:02 PM Response to Reply #89 |
111. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Billy Ruffian
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #89 |
274. Good heavens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fudge stripe cookays
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 06:08 AM Response to Reply #274 |
303. And do you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Billy Ruffian
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 08:40 PM Response to Reply #303 |
338. yes, yes, maybe. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fudge stripe cookays
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 06:13 AM Response to Reply #338 |
342. Then expect this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Billy Ruffian
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #342 |
344. I wonder if there is a point somewhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bigmack
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:33 PM Response to Reply #6 |
92. Probably not a Marine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:59 PM Response to Reply #92 |
106. That's why I guess DIA ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 03:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
186. DIA was my guess, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 04:19 PM Response to Reply #186 |
189. Yep. They'd also be interested in current active duty military protesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 04:25 PM Response to Reply #186 |
190. What is DIA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caligirl
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 06:08 PM Response to Reply #190 |
214. defense intelligence agency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 06:22 PM Response to Reply #214 |
218. Thanks. New since 9-11? Domestic spying? Homeland security? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caligirl
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 10:37 PM Response to Reply #218 |
258. Not new. they have been around for a long time. works for the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:25 PM Response to Reply #258 |
270. Read about MLK's tracking by the Army, even worse surveillance than FBI's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ktlyon
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:22 AM Response to Reply #6 |
311. note the hair cut on the guy's partner, shaved above ears |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
12. Are they from the Jeff Gannon school of photo journalism? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
15. NOSHEEP that is for sure. kick ass, you. excellent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:45 AM Response to Reply #15 |
54. It was scary but it really sickened me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:23 PM Response to Reply #54 |
81. i ask.... what is going to happen to those that arent intimidate by those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:29 PM Response to Reply #81 |
87. That's an interesting issue. I think it is important to let these people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrazyOrangeCat
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
16. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
17. There's a cop looking over his shoulder. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:14 PM Response to Reply #17 |
74. That guy with the leather jacket on was his associate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #74 |
93. Second photo down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:49 PM Response to Reply #93 |
100. Wow! I didn't even see that cop!! He may have noticed the confrontation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conscious evolution
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 07:42 PM Original message |
That jacket is an A2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
308. What military? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conscious evolution
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #308 |
331. US Navy pilots gets them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sydnie
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
18. His buddy in the background |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tin Man
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #18 |
31. dude, that's a fold in the fabric of his shirt... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sydnie
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:02 PM Response to Reply #31 |
66. Ok, I'll loosen the tin foil ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tin Man
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:16 PM Original message |
I only meant "dude" in the most generic, unisex construct... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sydnie
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
85. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
19. He doesn't look very proud of himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
20. Agent Mike! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:26 AM Response to Reply #20 |
33. He's not a bad looking guy, I guess. Too bad his politics are so messed up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:19 PM Response to Reply #33 |
269. He doesn't have politics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 07:37 AM Response to Reply #269 |
305. The guys in the Auschwitz gas chambers just had "jobs" too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:30 AM Response to Reply #305 |
313. Thank you for mentioning that. It is exactly the way I feel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 12:29 PM Response to Reply #313 |
324. Honestly, I thought people would give me grief over hyperbole but to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #324 |
326. Yes. To me as well. Germany was the extreme...yet we have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 09:32 PM Response to Reply #305 |
343. It's still a piece of apparatus we cannot do without. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
24. creepy dudes all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
25. Let's photoshop his face into pornographic pictures and spread it around the web! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrazyOrangeCat
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. now yr talkin'! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tin Man
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:43 AM Response to Reply #28 |
53. LMAO... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AikidoSoul
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #25 |
188. Yaaay. Call up Swamp Rat immediately -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 07:45 PM Response to Reply #25 |
232. LOL!!! Do that! I double dog dare ya!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlackVelvet04
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
27. What do I think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GETPLANING
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
29. It's Agent Smith! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
148. No, it's Agent Johnson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 12:49 AM Response to Reply #148 |
282. They're all Agent Johnson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
negativenihil
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
30. k&r for the secret police |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
32. That's a hell of a camera that dude has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:30 AM Response to Reply #32 |
39. Actually it looks like a standard mid level digital SLR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:36 AM Response to Reply #39 |
45. You know better than me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MattSh
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:45 PM Response to Reply #39 |
97. Not really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B3Nut
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 04:47 PM Response to Reply #39 |
192. It looks like a Nikon D2X |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 04:53 PM Response to Reply #192 |
195. It was the biggest and fanciest camera I'd ever seen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B3Nut
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 05:35 PM Response to Reply #195 |
203. I would have had a hard time not drooling, actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 06:24 PM Response to Reply #203 |
219. I've thought of all the different fronts I could have put on to try to get more info... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #195 |
332. Next time just follow him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 07:24 PM Response to Reply #332 |
336. I really did want him to have a taste of his own medicine. I don't think what he was doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
36. Talon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ronnie
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:51 PM Response to Reply #36 |
171. Lake Forth, Florida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 12:20 AM Response to Reply #36 |
275. I remember seeing this cop videotaping us in San Diego march back on September 24th... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:34 AM Response to Reply #36 |
315. The website that got the Quakers into so much trouble inthefirstplace |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
37. We should start a wiki photo database of odd folks at demonstrations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YOY
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:32 AM Response to Reply #37 |
43. Wonder how quick it'll be before it gets shut down or at least attempted to shut down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Umbram
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:39 AM Response to Reply #37 |
48. It's been done already. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #48 |
184. link? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Umbram
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #184 |
191. Not the one I was thinking of, but: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 04:48 PM Response to Reply #191 |
193. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #37 |
147. Well, that's what THEY think they are doing too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #147 |
151. I agree but it still would be useful to have a mugshot gallery. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:58 PM Response to Reply #151 |
173. Absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hardrada
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 08:37 PM Response to Reply #173 |
242. We have to use Paranoids now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ktlyon
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:49 AM Response to Reply #151 |
320. no need for pictures, they will be the ones proposing violence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clinton_Co_Regulator
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:36 PM Response to Reply #37 |
168. Good Idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
40. Now we know what Agent Mike looks like.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unhappycamper
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #40 |
75. Here's Agent Mike in uniform. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
133724
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
41. I took this one when * was in Seattle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:32 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Wow, they don't really blend, do they? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:22 PM Response to Reply #42 |
158. Designated Decoys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:33 PM Response to Reply #158 |
165. You'd fit right in around our house. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
133724
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:22 AM Response to Reply #158 |
298. can you see where the pan tilt web cams are????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:46 AM Response to Reply #41 |
56. Those guys are clearly local cops or FBI - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
133724
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:37 AM Response to Reply #56 |
300. I took a class from an IRS Criminal Investigator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:19 PM Response to Reply #41 |
77. Yep! They're so obviously from the "dark side". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brettdale
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 05:56 PM Response to Reply #41 |
209. Oh My |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
44. Hellllloooo Agent Mike! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TZ
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
46. Defending the country from us dangerous pacifists... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:50 AM Response to Reply #46 |
60. he as much as admitted it to me. I said "You don't look like you belong here" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TZ
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:53 AM Response to Reply #60 |
63. kudos to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Umbram
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #60 |
65. Heh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TZ
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:13 PM Response to Reply #65 |
72. I know what a telephoto lens is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:20 PM Response to Reply #65 |
79. I'm no camera expert, but I know a pig when I see one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xenotime
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
47. People have been known to disappear for such things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #47 |
167. If they were going to disappear somebody they would do it BEFORE their picture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
51. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #51 |
113. Deleted message |
SAXMAR
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
55. FBI at Vietnam War rallies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onecent
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
58. Kick and recommend. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaurenG
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
59. He's really good looking whoever he is. : ) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
61. what's the mystery? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
62. These guys should be taking pics at the freeper rally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:22 PM Response to Reply #62 |
80. Ding! You are so right about that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #80 |
129. I suppose "rally" is the incorrect terminology seeing as only a handful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:53 PM Response to Reply #62 |
141. you said a mouthful! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowdogmi
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
64. Finally a confirmed sighting of agent Mike? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Jefferson_24
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
67. They're collecting information for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 08:10 PM Response to Reply #67 |
236. Well, that was certainly disturbing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Jefferson_24
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 10:26 PM Response to Reply #236 |
255. Beech Grove, Indiana... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 01:58 PM Response to Reply #255 |
330. I found it.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Jefferson_24
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 06:25 PM Response to Reply #330 |
335. Looks like the place... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undergroundpanther
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 12:59 AM Response to Reply #67 |
285. I believe it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthernSpy
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
68. not a bad looking guy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
69. taking these kids' pictures?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:12 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Many in the group appeared college aged. I'm in my 40's so to me, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:05 PM Response to Reply #71 |
115. Oh, OK. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #115 |
124. I have only just started to feel a little old....I should resist...I saw some very |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 09:39 PM Response to Reply #115 |
248. I'd like to admit I'm in my 40's, but I can't. Left the 40's this year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeroysphitz
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
70. I smell bacon. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unperson
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
73. Defense Intelligence Agency n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
78. The guy in the red sweater looks suspicious too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Veronica.Franco
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:26 PM Response to Reply #78 |
83. These pictures belong on the FRONT PAGE ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
82. they always video tape marches here in chicago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #82 |
90. This man was NOT polite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #90 |
134. well we have quite a history here in chicago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
86. STOP TAKING PICTURES OF LITTLE GIRLS PANTIES YOU PEDOPHILE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mongo
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #86 |
108. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #108 |
123. :) Just think of the reaction of the folks around these two as they try |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tin Man
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #123 |
180. LMAO, that would be hilarious... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #180 |
181. it is hard work but somebody has to do it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
88. He should have been taking pictures of this man: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #88 |
91. Agreed. I have some great pictures of the good people who were there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:41 PM Response to Reply #91 |
95. I forgot to say: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 12:41 AM Response to Reply #88 |
279. Oh my God. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 01:11 AM Response to Reply #279 |
287. And it's not just him. His (son?) following behind with the wheelchair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 01:16 AM Response to Reply #287 |
288. Yes, yes that too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:36 PM Original message |
Probably looking for military personnel in the crowd. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsmesgd
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
94. Are there any pictures of their "shoes". Spooks are known by their shoes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:41 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. In Russia during the Cold War |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
98. sorry, but i don't see what's so wrong about the guy taking pics of protesters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #98 |
102. You haven't seen the video I saw of a protest in Oregon. Miami also. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:24 PM Response to Reply #102 |
127. i never thought that it was someone taking "memento" pictures... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:26 PM Response to Reply #127 |
128. You are right. I hate his sorry fascist ass anyway! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
99. I don't know - he's looks too FLABBY to be in the military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:54 PM Response to Reply #99 |
103. I kind of thought that too. If he is, he's had a desk job for a while. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsmesgd
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:58 PM Response to Reply #99 |
105. have you ever seen anything like this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:04 PM Response to Reply #105 |
114. In the top photo...his camera strap seems to be hanging up on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsmesgd
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:12 PM Response to Reply #114 |
118. it's on the level of his right elbow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdpeters
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:06 PM Response to Reply #99 |
116. He might be a cop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 10:25 PM Response to Reply #99 |
254. That's what I thought. He's certainly not special forces |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mindfulNJ
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
101. He may just be a stock photographer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:55 PM Response to Reply #101 |
104. Why did he act so mean and evil? Why didn't he just say.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #104 |
107. Some people are natural assholes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #107 |
109. No doubt! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mindfulNJ
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #104 |
110. well, as a stock photographer myself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:02 PM Response to Reply #110 |
112. I assure you he was an asshole. It was the haircut...and his buddy there with him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:10 PM Response to Reply #112 |
117. Maybe they are fashion friends. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:13 PM Response to Reply #112 |
119. Can't tell on the glasses, but it's so not the same haircut... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #119 |
122. High and tight on 2 different heads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:29 PM Response to Reply #122 |
130. The red haired guy does not have a high and tight... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:40 PM Response to Reply #130 |
136. Ah...yes the darker hair is white-walled. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 07:59 PM Response to Reply #122 |
233. I wear my hair hi & tight, but stylish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdpeters
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:13 PM Response to Reply #110 |
120. NoSheep is correct. You don't have to buy into it, but it's clear as day to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #120 |
131. I'm never one to think the worst right off the bat... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #104 |
138. Maybe he thought you were being a hysterical asshole? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:14 PM Response to Reply #138 |
152. What's not to be hysterical about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 05:57 PM Response to Reply #138 |
210. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:18 PM Response to Reply #104 |
154. Because he was confronted by someone... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:29 PM Response to Reply #154 |
161. Maybe you haven't seen the footage I saw from an Oregon demonstration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #161 |
172. That's fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 03:32 PM Response to Reply #172 |
183. They can. And I don't disagree with you. He can be angry at me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 06:00 PM Response to Reply #104 |
211. A Different Approach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
121. Mike needs to be more careful or nicer or something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
125. Personally, I Think It Was Just A Guy Taking Pictures, Nothing More. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #125 |
126. You would!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
132. Geez, buzz haircuts, buff bodies, military looking sweaters, black |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #132 |
133. buff? i think you mean CHUBBY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:43 PM Response to Reply #132 |
170. but what he told you might have been a cover story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #170 |
175. Maybe at the protest, which is political, but the Strawberry Festival, is just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
135. Hey, I recognize them, they look like the same couple of guys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:42 PM Response to Reply #135 |
137. I thought they looked "familiar" as well! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:47 PM Response to Reply #137 |
139. Yeah, this sort of thing has been going on since the anti-war protests of Vietnam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StrictlyRockers
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
142. They act scared of us and they should be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
146. I think sweaterman is packing heat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsmesgd
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:21 PM Response to Reply #146 |
155. my guess is that the photographer has a right hand cross draw rig on his left side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
specimenfred1984
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
150. Who takes pictures with sunglasses on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:21 PM Response to Reply #150 |
157. Are you suggesting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
specimenfred1984
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #157 |
198. Those guys were standing out on purpose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 05:55 PM Response to Reply #150 |
208. I Do - I Wear Prescription Sunglasses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
specimenfred1984
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 02:20 AM Response to Reply #208 |
294. Do they exactly match both matching pairs the guys are wearing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
153. GREAT WORK!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catmandu57
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
156. As sinister as these guy look like I don't think they're the ones to worry about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:34 PM Response to Reply #156 |
166. You're probably right about that. They weren't the worst of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:38 AM Response to Reply #156 |
318. The infiltrators, agents provacateurs are setting up shop for the next convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wicket
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
159. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
160. My guess---FBI...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
162. Thats easy........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
164. Knock, knock, knock. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chorophyll
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
174. K & R and daaamn, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
176. I'd guess they are FBI. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
182. I never would have thought that the DoD spied on Quakers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rosesaylavee
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
185. Kick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
187. A video I saw some time back showing surveillance of protesters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 06:36 PM Response to Reply #187 |
222. Consider the value of "dissent" if the "powers that be" ignore it /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
194. Kick For More Exposure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northofdenali
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
196. Hey, Mr. Photographer - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #196 |
197. LOL! ..."aren't smart enough to send themselves" Sad but true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jilln
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
199. A friend of mine did a similar thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
va4wilderness
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
200. This is kind of juvenile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 07:43 PM Response to Reply #200 |
230. You can't spell. That's a sign, y'know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 07:45 PM Response to Reply #200 |
231. These men ALSO didn't know those they were obviously attempting to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
va4wilderness
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:32 AM Response to Reply #231 |
314. Admittedly, this guy "looks" kind of creepy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 02:20 AM Response to Reply #200 |
293. We can't do the same thing to them as they are doing to us - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meldroc
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
201. Probably Feds, but could be other people as well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southern_belle
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
204. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
205. Impossible to say. The haircut and look means nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brettdale
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 05:54 PM Response to Reply #205 |
207. They dont look like they are there to protest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 06:03 PM Response to Reply #207 |
213. That much is apparent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brettdale
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
206. I SAY BLAST THESE PICTURES ALL OVER THE WEB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
212. DIA, or FBI, goon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BluePatriot
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
215. I swear I saw him on the CSPAN feed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
217. NoSheep, which street was this on? Maybe we could find them in a C-SPAN... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 06:26 PM Response to Reply #217 |
221. It was at the very end of the march. Back at the start...the end of the mall toward the capital |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oeditpus Rex
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
220. It's a guy who doesn't look like a liberal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
223. Mossad? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 08:15 PM Response to Reply #223 |
237. He probably doesn't know who he's working for - he just gets jobs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:38 AM Response to Reply #237 |
317. That is an interesting possibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 10:10 PM Response to Reply #223 |
251. Mossad would probably have little interest... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 12:58 AM Response to Reply #251 |
284. You're right, terrorists don't march. But fundraisers and financiers might. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
224. My guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 07:42 PM Response to Reply #224 |
229. Your sigline says it all. These men...each one, a single raindrop; yet each |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
225. DIA or NSA. Methinks FBI works a little smarter than this (plus they have smarter lawyers) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
226. Here's My Take...not reading whole thread...Cyndie Sheehan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJCher
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
227. Now they're not even bothering with costumes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 07:37 PM Response to Reply #227 |
228. My feelings exactly. Our tax dollars at work. I am reminded of the term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
byronius
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
234. There's the real problem. My tax dollars. Wasted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
byronius
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
235. PS: John Candy and Eugene Levy in 'Armed and Dangerous'. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 09:21 PM Response to Reply #235 |
244. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
238. Everyone else has already SAID it for me but Thanks n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
240. They look like undercover cops or FBI... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
241. Been thinking about this all day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bagrman
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
243. Your missing the little thing in your photo. Look at where the camera |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
246. Uh, what's the problem here, again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 09:45 PM Response to Reply #246 |
249. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 06:03 PM Response to Reply #246 |
334. Decoys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
250. What a disgusting animal... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ocean girl
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 10:21 PM Response to Reply #250 |
252. Kick - big time! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ptvet
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
253. Check out these guy's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 10:38 PM Response to Reply #253 |
260. If they have your picture only... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #253 |
263. They look silly, hiding a white cord against black skin. May be decoys or just what they seem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kerrytravelers
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
257. Shame Mr. Photographer there is workin' for *. He's kinda cute! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
261. Seriously, you need to make friends with some burly DUers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
262. Interesting, but you handled it badly for your objectives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reprehensor
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
264. Scott Ritter could him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
266. Pentagon employees. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
farmbo
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
267. Good God... It's Colonel Flagg from MASH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecoflame
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 12:02 AM Response to Reply #267 |
272. Speaking of Colonel Flagg |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
farmbo
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 08:17 AM Response to Reply #272 |
306. Yeah...Maybe that's what he'd like us to think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
268. No-wonder why today's anti-war protests can't compare to the 60's with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
271. Domestic spying, in Denver, is going to ramp up in '08 for the Dem Convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blockhead
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
273. Fess up Agent Mike, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
276. was it that sunny that they were wearing sunglasses? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 01:59 AM Response to Reply #276 |
290. All Five were wearing sunglasses including our guy, Red Sweater Guy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 09:56 AM Response to Reply #290 |
310. what a give away! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
277. carry signal mirrors with you. If being watched, flash it in the lens. Or have a lot of people do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undergroundpanther
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 01:03 AM Response to Reply #277 |
286. He doesen't have any nuts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 02:01 AM Response to Reply #277 |
291. Dumb idea. Wont work. Impractical. Don't waste our time, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mick Knox
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
281. CIA or FBI.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undergroundpanther
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
283. What a scum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deaniac21
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #283 |
327. Looks like everyone in the picture is wearing shades. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lvx35
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 01:41 AM Response to Original message |
289. Its a psych tactic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 11:09 AM Response to Reply #289 |
321. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurier
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 02:03 AM Response to Original message |
292. Looks like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piesRsquare
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 02:27 AM Response to Original message |
296. I think a lotta people around here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Umbram
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 07:36 AM Response to Reply #296 |
304. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave123williams
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 02:50 AM Response to Original message |
297. They're the President, Treasurer and Secretary of the Jeff Gannon Fan Club? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagickMuffin
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:40 AM Response to Original message |
301. Greg Helmsley |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:47 AM Response to Reply #301 |
319. Where is the link someone posted in your thread? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vickitulsa
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:20 AM Response to Original message |
302. NoSheep, my response to your pics and report was intense flashbacks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:36 AM Response to Reply #302 |
316. Thank you for your post. I realize everyone here didn't FEEL what I felt from them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave123williams
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 11:30 AM Response to Reply #316 |
323. Well, they *were* doing their duty as they saw it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #323 |
329. You raise a very good point here. If they are who I think they are, they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
312. I think you both took photos of other people in public. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Burnsey_Koenig
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
322. Just because you are paranoid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 01:37 PM Response to Reply #322 |
328. How do I know? Because I didn't just fall off a turnip truck! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deaniac21
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
325. I think I know these guys. I believe they are Blackwater snipers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kerry-is-my-prez
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
333. Some guys sprayed pepper spray a while back at another march. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ContraBass Black
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:23 AM Response to Original message |
340. He could be a news photographer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sammy Pepys
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
346. I'm not sure what the problem is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC