Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

General Eaton thank you, for telling me what I suspected

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:44 PM
Original message
General Eaton thank you, for telling me what I suspected
the Officer corp got it...

10-4 five by five... fully.

Translation to civies... the way the speech was crafted was understood by the men and women in uniform. They also received this as a message from a RESPONSIBLE CiC....

General thank you, I know they got it. I will quibble with the strategic message on Pakistan... I got it. I knew what he was talking about, but I think most civies (at least here) missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. FAIL. Unrecommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. +1
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. somebody said something that matters?
WOW...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nadin, I missed the General's comments. Can you clarify?
Btw, I just recc'd the unrec so you'd be able to start over on that score. :eyes:

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. He said that the speech, which was a bore for most
was understood by any graduate of the War College. He also said the cadets were fully engaged and understood that the CiC was not using them as props but explaining to them the strategic nature of the whole thing. This speech was crafted to talk chiefly to those carrying the mission. They also showed the cadets talking to the President in as excited a manner as a cadet will show.

To me the whole explanation of the Strategic mission, which is loose nukes in Warisistan and Pakistan's risk of falling to a failed state, was not that clear. But he said the General Staff got it.

And this is my view. they also got the ... shit we need to get ready to get out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I'm very glad to hear that he was speaking their language. I never think his speeches are boring...
... but then, I like his intellect and the way he never talks down to his audience. And since the POTUS is also the CiC, I'm glad they support him or at least understand where he's coming from.

Thanks for relaying this.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. He was and the reason, in my view, the strategic reasons
were a little muddled is that there is so much you can say before crossing into we don't want the other side to know how much we know.

And to those who believe the other is not monitoring this... no, the foot soldier is not, but leaders yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. Only one thing, every time the cadets were scanned across with
the camera they looked bored and some asleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Yes the ones who fell asleep
they probably did since being a cadet at Point is not a regular college and for many of them, especially plebes, (first year) it can be 20 hours with no sleep or more.

And I saw most of them engaged... a few were bored... like I have never, ever seen that in a regular college.

By the way those who were asleep, I am betting a one way ahem discussion with a Sergeant or senior cadet and a tooth brush... and field time. (aka cleaning something)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Most were bored, some asleep, I saw none that looked engaged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lxlxlxl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. rec'd....where did you hear this?
i think obama deserves and has the respect of the corps. where did you hear this btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. MSNBC just now with Tweety
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Somebody better let the people at VoteVets know
apparently they didn't understand it either. Of course they're "civies" now so maybe their opinion doesn't count. Just think how misguided our military policy would have been if the Founders had put civilians in control of the military. Oh wait...


http://www.vetvoice.com/showDiary.do ;jsessionid=F9712EFF9A9DF85946CFAD07CF9D5126?diaryId=3510

The veterans of VoteVets.org, the largest progressive group of veterans in America, said that the strategy left unanswered too many questions regarding strain on the Armed Forces, and didn't address other issues that would help ensure that the entire mission wouldn't be put on the backs of the troops.

Jon Soltz, Iraq war veteran and Chairman of VoteVets.org said, "We have been supportive of every move the President has made since he was elected, and have supported an increased focus on Afghanistan since our inception, but given the serious questions that are unresolved, we aren't ready to support what he's laid out. First and foremost, we are always concerned about the strain on the American servicemember, and this plan leaves very big questions on that issue.

Is there increased sacrifice from other agencies equal to what the administration is putting on the troops? A counter-insurgency strategy, which the President has laid out, the engine of American foreign policy firing on all cylinders. Without increasing the commitment of other branches of American foreign policy, will we continue to see troops having to serve as negotiators, diplomats, and nation builders? They weren't trained for that, and it isn't right to place that responsibility on their shoulders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I didn't say it was well explained at all
because it wasn't. But you can bet Eaton talked to some people STILL in uniform that have stars, so he got some valuable exchanges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasma ex machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. +1 left unanswered too many questions regarding strain on the Armed Forces
National Guard soldiers doing their 5th or 6th rotation into that hell hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Just tell them it's multi-dimensional "Risk"
Edited on Wed Dec-02-09 12:38 AM by glitch
Risk, the board game

Biden is correct, if the problem is loose nukes Special Forces are a better tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Loud and Clear. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
15. Bwaaa.
LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O is 44 Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
17. Thanks for this...
I missed this interview. President Obama reminds me of a professor when he speaks so I can see where this may have went over lots of people's heads. Stupid tweety bird Matthews kept screaming that there were no bumper sticker phrases. It is about time we had a President who speaks to us as adults. Although, I don't agree with this troop increase, I feel he has no really good solution in such a messed up situation. The government in Afghanistan is corrupt (thanks Bush for propping up this crook) I just don't see how this is going to work.

On another note there was another retired general that spoke on the Ed show, his first name is Jack. He made a comment that the some of the cadets he spoke with did not like when the President set a withdrawal date. He says the military does not like to be told about timelines. I am waiting for one idiot media person to tell the military their job is to take orders, they don’t get an opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. No the military does not like timelines
there are two reasons, one is strategic, the other is career oriented. I suspect for the cadets is the latter.

The strategic reason is that you do not want to tell your enemy, whoever it is. well shit this is the limit ok...

The career... if this works, the plebes (first year cadets) will not get to punch their ticket, no combat badge for them... that is bad for a career. A combat badge is good on your record... and they are in the war business after all. Also deploying to a war zone means some shinnies, no, not the CMH that usually people don't live through, but a bronze star looks good when advancement time comes.

Oh and I am not being cynical. I'm married to a career, now retired submariner (enlisted) and I served in another military that is way stingy with medals. And when I got my chance for doing a stupid maneuver, I refused it... that is another story. But I'd have to 'xplain the idiocy award to my mom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O is 44 Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Got it thanks for the explanation...
My Dad is ex Navy and my little Bro gets his first deployment in a few weeks but thankfully he is going to Japan for now. I'm up this late because he is coming to visit me in Cali, he has been down south visiting my parents. My Dad was Navy right out of college but he was not involved in any wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Tell your brother to keep his nose clean and stay out of trouble
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
18. I appreciate your insight ...

I did not see the General's comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. It was interesting to watch Eaton
he is, after all, very critical of the bushies and how they managed that mess. So having a capable CiC is a nice change for the military. I am sure some of his buddies still in uniform said that to him... and he passed it on. People who are out become the voices for those still in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC