Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wikipedia ordered by judge to break confidentiality of contributor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 11:26 AM
Original message
Wikipedia ordered by judge to break confidentiality of contributor
Source: telegraph.co.uk

A senior judge has ordered Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, to disclose the identity of one of its contributors after a mother and her young child pleaded for help in identifying an alleged blackmailer.

By Andrew Pierce
Published: 2:40PM GMT 02 Dec 2009

In the first case of its kind, Mr Justice Tugendhat ordered Wikipedia’s parent company, Florida-based Wikimedia Foundation Inc, to disclose the computer identity, known as an IP address, of one of its registered users.

The judge acted after hearing that the mother, who is well known in the business world, had received anonymous letters threatening to disclose to the media details of her professional life and expenses.

The mystery Wikipedia user made an “amendment” to the mother’s entry, also referring to her young child, and disclosing confidential and “sensitive” information about them. The businesswoman believes the Wikipedia contributor and the author of the anonymous letters are the same person...

Last month it emerged that computers linked to politicians and large companies had made sweeping edits of Wikipedia to rewrite or erase embarrassing...



Read more: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6710237/Wikipedia-ordered-by-judge-to-break-confidentiality-of-contributor.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is proper. One IP, needed in one criminal investigation.
No privacy issues that I can see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed, but I imagine the IP will be useless to the investigation
unless the suspected blackmailer is criminally incompetent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It has been my expirence that most users of the Internet are incompetent (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Many are. Gotta try.
Needs hour and minute of access, too, so the identity can be coaxed from the ISP in case of dynamic IPs. But that's in the public Wikipedia page histories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC