Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CREW Goes After the ‘Secret Hold’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 04:20 PM
Original message
CREW Goes After the ‘Secret Hold’
http://washingtonindependent.com/69432/crew-goes-after-the-secret-hold

CREW Goes After the ‘Secret Hold’
By David Weigel 12/2/09 4:00 PM


The watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington is targeting the senatorial practice of the “secret hold,” arguing that the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act, passed two years ago, prevents these holds. That’s certainly not the Senate’s view. From CREW:

To determine whether senators have complied with the ban, CREW conducted a day-by-day review of the Senate Calendar of Business dating from the law’s passage in 2007 through today. Over this two-year period, CREW only found two bills that had “a notice of intent to object” placed in the calendar. For the same period, however, CREW discovered several bills and nominations that appeared to have had secret holds placed on them, but for which no corresponding objections were placed in the calendar and no senator publicly announced a hold.


The “secret hold” is one of the most easily understood, least reported-on quirks of the Senate that slows down business. And I’ve yet to meet a senator who defends the process; when I talked about holds with Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) last month, he suggested that it would be better if the media covered the circumstances of holds and filibusters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC