Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Usama Bin Forgotten.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 01:55 PM
Original message
Usama Bin Forgotten.
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 02:11 PM by blm
"...not really concerned about him..."


That was the real Bush Doctrine that he implemented the last 8 years in Afghanistan. The private doctrine that many of us noted even as the corporate media and the general public did not.


And that was the doctrine that most of DU argued against in 2004, 2006 and 2008. Usama Bin Forgotten....It was far more of a serious criticism than a jokeline to most of us.


I was against more troops as the answer to securing Afghanistan to the point where troops could begin to withdraw, but, it is the answer Obama decided. If he had wanted it to be perpetual war as Bush did he would have let the hawk camp have their way of much broader and fuller escalation with no withdrawal plan attached months ago.

The voices for a narrower military mission and for a timely withdrawal DID win some of their battles against the hawk camp during those months he was deliberating, and I will trust that they will continue to use their influence throughout the next 18 months to achieve their goal.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, no, no
The Bush Doctrine refers to preemptive military intervention to stop current, emerging, or possible future threats. It rests on the philosophy that the US is always right in protecting its interests in a military manner, even if the danger is not clear and present.

What you are referring to is merely an excuse Bush used to hide his failure. He rests a large part of his war justifications on the premise that he must eliminate OBL and any future threat associated with him. Because he failed, he fell back to trying to make OBL irrelevant to hide his failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yours is the definition of the public doctrine. I'm pointing to his ACTUAL doctrine
that has been in operation in Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. All this is true, but ...
the question now is whether it's too late. Did Dubya already lose it for us, or can 'Afpakistan' still be recovered? 2004, 2006, and even 2008 are now far behind us; and 2002-2004 were the most-critical years. I'm willing to give the President a chance; but I am very afraid that this may prove to be his LBJ moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Giving him that chance, too, though I think he could meet timeline measures with the troops
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 03:56 PM by blm
already there. But, my overall point is that there is a possibility of real success with an honest effort - like the honest effort that Pat Tillman and many others signed up for but never experienced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC