Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bernanke's assault on Social Security and Medicare

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 04:44 PM
Original message
Bernanke's assault on Social Security and Medicare
Ben Bernanke has overseen the greatest expansion of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet in its history, pouring trillions of dollars into Wall Street firms at roughly zero interest rates.

His generosity, however, has a limit.

In testimony before the Senate Banking Committee today, where he's seeking re-appointment as the Fed's chairman, Bernanke called for cutbacks in Medicare and Social Security even as unemployment rises and the middle class is endangered.

Citing legendary bank robber Willie Sutton, Bernanke said of the retirement and health care funds that are the legacy of the New Deal: "That's where the money is." <snip>


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/03/bernanke-channels-willie_n_378963.html


There they go again. Hope the people being swayed by the Republican's crying over hurting Medicare with HCR are hearing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. God what stupid people!
Doesn't the average Freeper know what it would cost them to keep grandma when she is no longer able to work and pay her medical expenses if those greed peddlers get their way? The FICA deducted from their wages is a pittance compared to that. Bernanke needs to go. I guess all the money they have raked from the Treasury isn't enough. They want it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Let's all hope Sanders' is successful in blockin this asshat
I want Goldman Sachs out of our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Ditto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. stupid is as stupid does
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Obviously Bernanke's retirement is pretty well set up...Unlike the rest of us, he has no worries.
:mad: :puke: :grr: :nuke: :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. thanks again, Obama, for this amazingly bone-headed, corrupt choice
and you persist, wanting to reappoint him. It's as though nothing has been learned AT ALL--or maybe you just don't care--you actually think we won't notice the gouging we'd be getting the next time. On that basis alone (but the health care nonleadership, bullshit of "bipartisanship" and republican ass-kissing, and escalation of war are certainly not forgotten either!), I won't vote for you ever again, and will never engage in your "goals" or "forums."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. The usual suspects-Kent Conrad (Di)ckhead ND
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 05:02 PM by laughingliberal
Further on in the article:

<snip> Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) has been pushing hard for the creation of an independent commission that could cut entitlement spending. He has met recently, he said Thursday, with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, reiterating his threat to block Senate legislation if the commission isn't created.<snip>

"We're on a course that's just unsustainable," Conrad said, but put emphasis on Medicare rather than Social Security.<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. how long til we hear "it's only been N months: there's so much Bush badness to undo!!!!111"?
it's like the Baltarites don't even read the OPs showing Obama as a second Herbert Hoover
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. In fairness there are pressing matters to discuss today like Roger Ebert's
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 05:53 PM by laughingliberal
thoughts on how new agers are just the left wing version of fundamentalist Christians. How could we worry about President Obama's nominee attacking SS and Medicare at a time like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Walter W. Waters, where are you?
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 06:12 PM by MisterP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonus_Army

got a link to Ebert's rant? sounds like the villains in Mage: The Ascension
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. We could use a guy like that, today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aldo Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. The elite has decided to turn their back on the American people. With globalization they no longer
need us. They are consigning us to third world status. And they own both parties, including Obama and Michelle Antoinette. Look how they bought out the Clintons, now multi-millionaires. Money buys loyalty. Our so-called leaders have no loyalty to the taxpayers and voters of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well, that's certainly depressing
More truth in it than I care for but let's hope it's not quite that bad with the Obamas, yet. Not saying it's not true, just that I'm willing to be proven wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. gee, he was easily corruptible
or was he "that way" from the beginning, only we were too gullible and too hurting after * to notice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. Bernanke is all about privatizing everything, especially if that's where the money is
If Bernanke feels he owes anyone anything it will be to his amoral RW puppeteers, they're already citing 2017 when SS will be bankrupt - sounds like more like the time-line/deadline Bernanke and Wall Street are shooting for, and that's only seven years away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I am appalled to see us not veering much from the same RW economic policies we had under the
previous administration. I'm scared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mascarax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. Why can't we eliminate the Social Security cap & get more $$?
It's $106,800, and the Social Security tax rate is 6.20% paid by the employee and 6.20% paid by the employer.

I thought Obama campaigned on eliminating the cap so those above would pay more (and there was some middle ground stuff -- point was to go after the much-higher wage earners).

What happened with this? Why isn't it an option being discussed? (Or maybe it's not getting publicity...I haven't heard anything...)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I favor that approach. And I have heard nothing since the campaign was over about it nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. because it = destroying SS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Where the money is?
The last numbers I saw showed military spending to be the lion share of the budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Thank you - I keep saying that too. If you exclude SS and Medicare
which have separate "trust" funds - our military budget is 58% of where our income tax goes. No one ever talks about it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. No, no one ever mentions cutting military spending when they talk deficit reduction nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC