Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hope Remains Ancient Archaeological Site Can Be Saved

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 08:15 PM
Original message
Hope Remains Ancient Archaeological Site Can Be Saved
SOURCE: The Epoch Times
By Joan Delaney
Epoch Times Staff

VICTORIA—A burial ground and archaeological site dating back millennia are at the heart of a long-running saga between a developer and a First Nations community in British Columbia.

Archeological excavations at the Somenos Creek site near Duncan on Vancouver Island have uncovered material as old as 4,600 years. The burial ground, which was in use for 600 years, is about 1,800 years old.

An excavation undertaken by the University of British Columbia (UBC) in 1994 revealed a shell midden, graves, and artifacts that include a collection of chipped slate microblades, ground stone knives, bone awls, and toggling harpoon valves.

Of 33 additional excavations in 2007, 30 were of archaeological value. One of the more remarkable finds was a 2,000-year-old large architectural feature that could be a house foundation or a hearth, says archaeologist Eric McLay.

LINK: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/25972/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Alameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Material 4,600 years old...........but only 1,800 years old?
.....grrr....I really am getting to hate "developers"............it seems most of the time they are destroyers. Interesting article, thank you for posting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The cemetery is 1800 years old. Used for 600 years. But other material in the area is as old as 4600
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Saved in what respect?
SOP is to excavate such places, let the universities gather what they can, and then continue the development. There is no reason to believe that this site is related to any extant people, and certainly no reason to give it any more or less consideration than any other anonymous site. This continent is littered with the remains of the human past. You can't make every unmarked grave a national monument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's a First Nation site
the local tribe wants to buy it, but they don't have the money right now. Until then, then the site is in limbo.

It's making the developer antsy. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. About now, I would think the developer would prefer to sell it to them rather than develop.
Is Vancouver a real estate hot spot?

There was a developer in Virginia who almost specialized in this sort of thing. He would buy a "sensistive" piece of land, threaten to build townhouses or retail on it, and then sell it to the state for a sizable profit. Not bad for a short term investment, some bulldozing, and a press release.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC