Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN - "Clinton: We don't intend to cut and run from Afghanistan"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 01:43 AM
Original message
CNN - "Clinton: We don't intend to cut and run from Afghanistan"
Remember when the mainstream media was trying to spread rumors of Hillary Clinton being marginalized in the Obama administration? Hillary prominent role in forming the Afganistan strategy and President Obama's agreement to a surge that she supported demostrates that these rumors were untrue, and that Hillary and the President have been able to work together closely.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/12/04/afghanistan.clinton/index.html



Brussels, Belgium (CNN) -- Secretary of State Hillary Clinton rejected suggestions Friday that the Obama administration plans to abruptly cut and run from Afghanistan.

She emphasized that the transition to total Afghan power will be gradual and responsible.

"I want to make clear to the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan that we're looking for a long-term partnership," said Clinton, speaking with CNN's John Roberts in a wide-ranging interview about U.S. policy toward Afghanistan and Pakistan.

When President Obama announced sending 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan, he said he intended "to begin the transfer of our forces out of Afghanistan in July of 2011" in a responsible transition that considers "conditions on the ground."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Afghanization": Now there's new and improved ....
...one might even say 'transformational' .... concept that we can all really get behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Seen this before
It sure worked good the last time </sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. In other words, we're ......

"Waist Deep In The Big Muddy "

Some people never learn. OK, Barack. You have an excuse: you were running around in shortpants. But Ms. Clinton!


Waist Deep In The Big Muddy :
It was back in nineteen forty-two,
I was a member of a good platoon.
We were on maneuvers in-a Loozianna,
One night by the light of the moon.
The captain told us to ford a river,
That's how it all begun.
We were -- knee deep in the Big Muddy,
But the big fool said to push on.

The Sergeant said, "Sir, are you sure,
This is the best way back to the base?"
"Sergeant, go on! I forded this river
'Bout a mile above this place.
It'll be a little soggy but just keep slogging.
We'll soon be on dry ground."
We were -- waist deep in the Big Muddy
And the big fool said to push on.

The Sergeant said, "Sir, with all this equipment
No man will be able to swim."
"Sergeant, don't be a Nervous Nellie,"
The Captain said to him.
"All we need is a little determination;
Men, follow me, I'll lead on."
We were -- neck deep in the Big Muddy
And the big fool said to push on.

All at once, the moon clouded over,
We heard a gurgling cry.
A few seconds later, the captain's helmet
Was all that floated by.
The Sergeant said, "Turn around men!
I'm in charge from now on."
And we just made it out of the Big Muddy
With the captain dead and gone.

We stripped and dived and found his body
Stuck in the old quicksand.
I guess he didn't know that the water was deeper
Than the place he'd once before been.
Another stream had joined the Big Muddy
'Bout a half mile from where we'd gone.
We were lucky to escape from the Big Muddy
When the big fool said to push on.

Well, I'm not going to point any moral;
I'll leave that for yourself
Maybe you're still walking, you're still talking
You'd like to keep your health.
But every time I read the papers
That old feeling comes on;
We're -- waist deep in the Big Muddy
And the big fool says to push on.

Waist deep in the Big Muddy
And the big fool says to push on.
Waist deep in the Big Muddy
And the big fool says to push on.
Waist deep! Neck deep! Soon even a
Tall man'll be over his head, we're
Waist deep in the Big Muddy!
And the big fool says to push on!
< Waist Deep In The Big Muddy Lyrics on http://www.lyricsmania.com/ >
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Ms Clinton was helping Old Billy DODGE THE DRAFT
In the days of my little "Cluster Fuck"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. I am having flashbacks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Do Obama Officials Know What his Afghanistan Plan Is?
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/12/04-11

Published on Friday, December 4, 2009 by Salon.com

Do Obama Officials Know What his Afghanistan Plan Is?
by Glenn Greenwald

On the vital question of whether Obama is committed to begin withdrawing troops from Afghanistan in July, 2011 -- or whether that's just an aspirational target subject to being moved -- the statements from key administration officials aren't merely in tension with one another, but are exact opposites:

Agence France-Press, yesterday:

President Barack Obama's administration said that a July 2011 target date to begin withdrawing US troops from Afghanistan was not set in stone. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, and the top uniformed US military officer, Admiral Michael Mullen, sought to sell the new approach under fire from Obama's hawkish Republican foes.

During hours of questioning by two key committees, they made clear that his target date of starting a US troop withdrawal in 19 months' time -- a step some anti-escalation lawmakers, especially Democrats, had cheered -- could slip.

"I do not believe we have locked ourselves into leaving," said Clinton, who added the goal was "to signal very clearly to all audiences that the United States is not interested in occupying Afghanistan."

Gates said the extra troops Obama had ordered to Afghanistan would be in place in July 2010, that a December 2010 review of the war effort would shape the pace of the withdrawal, and that the target date could change.

CBS News, Wednesday:



I asked White House spokesman Robert Gibbs if senators were incorrect calling the date a "target."

After the briefing, Gibbs went to the president for clarification. Gibbs then called me to his office to relate what the president said. The president told him it IS locked in -- there is no flexibility. Troops WILL start coming home in July 2011. Period. It's etched in stone. Gibbs said he even had the chisel.

What could possibly explain a contradiction this extreme with regard to a question so central to the policy Obama just announced? How can you have the Defense Secretary and the Secretary of State testifying in front of the Senate that the July, 2011 date is "not set in stone," that they "have not locked oursleves into leaving," and that "the target date could change," while the President is saying exactly the opposite: that "it IS locked in - there is no flexibility" and "it's etched in stone"?

Is it remotely possible that the months of extremely careful, cerebral, thoughtful deliberations produced complete ambiguity on this central point, or is it that Obama's plan is designed to be sufficiently ambiguous so that nobody knows what it actually entails and everyone can therefore be told that it means what they want it to mean? And which is worse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. there is no 'plan'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. So, now we have people dying for Hillary's ego gratification.
How very...political.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. But are we cutting and running from America?
(okay, this response has nothing to do with Afghanistan but has more to do with an irrelevant tangent to the quote stated.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. mmm... me wonders Who 'accused' who of wanting to 'cut 'n run' from...
... and for what reason, exactly?

(what is this constant repeating of retardlican's attacks modus operandi??) :shrug:

and which is which? 18 months or... NEVER (until we're bankrupt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. The "cut and run" meme should be retired altogether. I am appalled whenever
a Democratic politician uses it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. CNN put words in Clinton's mouth. She didn't use the phrase "cut and run."
I'm appalled by its use too. It comes straight from the right-wing playbook.
I've heard Secretary Clinton do some saber rattling in the past, but she did not use the phrase.
The CNN correspondent did. He should be ashamed of himself.
But, alas, I'm not at all surprised that he used it.
It's all part of the corporate media's job of manufacturing perception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thank you for clarifying this. What words did Clinton use?
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Her words were more measured and diplomatic. Just as you might expect
Edited on Sat Dec-05-09 02:28 PM by RufusTFirefly
"I want to make clear to the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan that we're looking for a long-term partnership."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. "Long term partnership" does not equal "won't cut and run"
M$M does it again....

sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. I wonder if any people on the face of this planet
can possibly mistake what the United States means when they say they want a "partnership".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Me too!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. cut and run is a bushism,
isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. Um, Secretary Clinton, the people of Afghanistan want us out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. Clinton Republicans - no surprise. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC