Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gates: "Exit Afghanistan in 2011? Just Kidding, Chumps!"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 04:03 PM
Original message
Gates: "Exit Afghanistan in 2011? Just Kidding, Chumps!"
Perhaps only a “handful” of American troops will be leaving Afghanistan in July 2011, the date President Obama has set to begin a gradual withdrawal, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said in an interview broadcast Sunday.

“We will have 100,000 forces, troops there,” Mr. Gates said on ABC’s “This Week,” “and they are not leaving in July of 2011. Some, handful, or some small number, or whatever the conditions permit, will begin to withdraw at that time.”

“I don’t consider this an exit strategy,” he continued, “This is a transition.” He said it would begin in less-contested parts of Afghanistan before expanding to the most obdurate Taliban strongholds, largely in the south and east.

The White House used appearances on the Sunday talk programs to convey that the deadline would mark the start, not the end, of troop withdrawal. “2011 is not a cliff, it’s a ramp,” Gen. James L. Jones, the national security adviser, said.


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/07/world/asia/07policy.html?ref=global-home">Gates Calls July 2011 the Beginning, Not End, of Afghan Withdrawal

How many times does Lucy need to yank the football before Charlie Brown learns? This all has become more predictable than a Republican voting "nay".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Keywords: BEGIN WITHDRAWAL (in 2011)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Key phrase: "Some, handful, or some small number, or whatever the conditions permit, ...
Edited on Sun Dec-06-09 04:10 PM by eleny
...will begin to withdraw at that time." - Secy Defense Gates on Meet the Press, today.

That kind of talk would drive Jesus to a barstool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. In other words those key words are empty words
Obama put those into his speech in the hopes that people would think they actually meant something meaningful, but they don't mean anything. There is no exit strategy, and removing a small handful of troops will not bring an end to this unjust war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Keywords: Project Your Belief Onto Me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Didn't President Obama say "start the pullout in 2011"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yup. Right before the election. But, of course, that didn't have anything to do with the date.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Or with total pullout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Or with anything for that matter...
They were just empty words to make people believe the end to this war is in sight and keep them from getting out in the streets and protesting this decision. The fact is however that there is no exit strategy and there is no end to this war in sight, that is why people need to take to the streets and resist this unjust occupation of Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yet they will keep lying to us about the "exit strategy" for another 18 months
Edited on Sun Dec-06-09 04:09 PM by Bjorn Against
Then when we reach July of 2011 and see that there is no end in sight to the war they will tell us to just be a little more patient. At that point I will have been protesting this war for nearly a decade, and I will not patiently watch as more people get killed in this unjust war no matter how much the defenders of this massacre want me to shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. I never thought he meant they'd be all out by that date
I never thought anything close to that, and I didn't hear anyone talking about it as if it meant that.

I thought he meant what Gates just said, that they'd begin withdrawing on that date, and it seemed everyone else saw it that way too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. There were many people on this site calling it an "exit strategy"
The people who thought this was an exit strategy were clearly wrong, there is no exit strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. So Why Even Mention The Date?
I think we both know that date will be as useful as Obama's promise of a public option for health insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
placton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. Change We can Believe in
Obama was referring to his promises it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. Smooth Talk.
Chump Change.


The "Chicago" Razzel Dazzel

Give 'em the old razzle dazzle
Razzle Dazzle 'em
Give 'em an act with lots of flash in it
And the reaction will be passionate
Give 'em the old hocus pocus
Bead and feather 'em
How can they see with sequins in their eyes?
What if your hinges all are rusting?
What if, in fact, you're just disgusting?
Razzle dazzle 'em
And they;ll never catch wise!


Give 'em the old Razzle Dazzle
Razzle dazzle 'em
Give 'em a show that's so splendiferous
Row after row will crow vociferous
Give 'em the old flim flam flummox
Fool and fracture 'em
How can they hear the truth above the roar?
Throw 'em a fake and a finagle
They'll never know you're just a bagel,
Razzle dazzle 'em
And they'll beg you for more!


Give 'em the old double whammy
Daze and dizzy 'em
Back since the days of old Methuselah
Everyone loves the big bambooz-a-ler
Give 'em the old three ring circus
Stun and stagger 'em
When you're in trouble, go into your dance
Though you are stiffer than a girder
They'll let you get away with murder
Razzle dazzle 'em
And you've got a romance


Give 'em the old Razzle Dazzle
Razzle dazzle 'em
Show 'em the first rate sorceror you are
Long as you keep 'em way off balance
How can they spot you've got no talent
Razzle Dazzle 'em
And they'll make you a star!


---Soundtrack from “Chicago”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. "Some, handful, or some small number" are already leaving each month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Such A Sad Thought - But So True
Entire thing looks to be a FUBAR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. All the talking points
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/12/06/us.afghanistan/index.html

-- Top aides to President Obama on Sunday signaled that some U.S. troops could start coming home from Afghanistan as soon as July 2011, but most would likely remain there for several years.

In appearances on all the major talk shows, Cabinet officials and military advisers clarified the president's position after he walked a political tightrope by announcing he will send 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan and that some will start coming home in 19 months.

National Security Adviser Gen. James Jones told CNN's "State of the Union" that the July 2011 start of withdrawal was "not a cliff, it's a ramp" for beginning to turn over security responsibility to Afghan forces.

Noting the U.S. strategic interests in the region, including nuclear power Pakistan next door, Jones said: "We're going to be in the region for a long time."

Gen. David Petraeus, the head of U.S. Central Command, said on "FOX News Sunday" that Obama's strategy "doesn't trigger a rush to the exits," while Defense Secretary Robert Gates told CBS' "Face the Nation" that "there isn't a deadline."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC