Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: Tea Party could loom in elections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 12:09 AM
Original message
Poll: Tea Party could loom in elections
Poll: Tea Party could loom in elections



WASHINGTON, Dec. 7 (UPI) -- U.S. congressional hopefuls running as Tea Party candidates could fare better than those running as Republicans, a Rasmussen Report released Monday indicates.

In a three-way generic ballot test, results found Democrats attracting 36 percent of the vote, the Tea Party candidate garnered 23 percent and Republicans collected 18 percent, Rasmussen said in a release. Another 22 percent of respondents said they were undecided.

Among voters not affiliated with either major party, the Tea Party movement emerged victorious, the results indicated. Thirty-three percent of people surveyed said they preferred the Tea Party candidate, 30 percent said they were undecided, 25 percent would vote for a Democrat, and 12 percent favored the GOP.

The respondents were asked to assume that the Tea Party movement organized as a new political party for purposes of the survey, Rasmussen said.

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2009/12/07/Poll-Tea-Party-could-loom-in-elections/UPI-66191260220199/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. LMAO
The loonies now officially run the asylum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Signs of the times
Both a fictional, non-existent party and "undecided" beat both of the major parties in our two-party system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. except it's rasmussen which means it's fiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I wouldn't be so sure of that
IIRC his polling was the most accurate in the last election, so I wouldn't dismiss it out of hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. not that I recall. Can you post evidence for that claim?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. check it out
Edited on Tue Dec-08-09 06:22 AM by notesdev
http://www.fordham.edu/images/academics/graduate_schools/gsas/elections_and_campaign_/poll%20accuracy%20in%20the%202008%20presidential%20election.pdf


What's the deal with people around here asking for links for stuff that they can find in 2 seconds by typing in the appropriate keywords in Google? (in this case "pollster accuracy 2008")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. KKK making a revival?
Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. That's fantastic news! Those foam rubber teapots will be easier to *flick* off their doddering heads
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. you = teabagger fail (news)
some people say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. This is interesting...
...seeing as the Tea Party Party basically has no ideological foundation. The remnants of the Republican Party have an ideological foundation, even if it's one that sucks and to which they rarely adhere.

Really, what do the teabaggers represent aside from extreme narcissism and a sort of vague old-people ignorance and bigotry? There's really not much there. I've yet to see any of these teabaggers actually propose a solution to any problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. The solution
is always less taxes and less government. It is a "one size fits all" solution to all imaginable problems. However, it comes with a "reduce the deficit but don't cut my benefits" caveat.

When considering these folks, it is important to remember that they believe government incapable of solving problems. Therefore when running for seats in government they will propose no solutions, except dismantling government. As they find that all problems are caused by government, destroying it is the presumed cure. They are quite uninterested in constructive ideas.

The good thing is that they have become quite capable of seriously splitting the formerly solid republican voting block.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That doesn't sound so far off from the current ideological underpinnings of the Republican party.
But I think the teabaggers take it to an extreme. I've never seen a group so convinced of their own purity with so little evidence to back it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC