Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington Post Explains Palin Op-Ed: 'We're Attention Whores'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 08:27 AM
Original message
Washington Post Explains Palin Op-Ed: 'We're Attention Whores'

Washington Post Explains Palin Op-Ed: We Did It For Attention


The Washington Post, as we all know, has the worst opinion section in America. The people who run it don't understand all the fuss about them running an op-ed by Sarah Palin on climate change!

Op-ed editor Autumn Brewington (who is presumably taking the flak for her boss, editorial page editor Fred Hiatt) seemed to be missing the point a bit in an interview with the soon-to-be-defunct Editor & Publisher.

Brewington did not regret giving Palin space, noting, "She is someone who stirs discussion and we are in the business of putting out opinion. She reached out to us."

Ah, yes, the traditional factors taken into consideration when accepting editorials. "Will this bring us attention? Good. Run it."

The fact that no one does or should take Sarah Palin, or her ghostwriter, seriously on any policy issue, let alone global fucking warming, and the fact that her op-ed was patent bullshit, and the fact that it was not even interesting or original bullshit and it never would've been published if the author hadn't been named "Sarah Palin" (or "George Will"), none of that is important. It made the most-emailed list, after all.

And that is why starting next week please enjoy the Washington Post's Editorial Roundtable on monetary policy, hosted by The Various Women Tiger Woods Has Fucked.


http://gawker.com/5423633/

LOL!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. or her ghostwriter
so true ...... Palin has trouble w/ spoken English let alone trying to write something.

She didn't write her book, she doesn't write her facebook posts, and although filled w/ factual errors the Post
piece was grammatically correct so it is very doubtful she wrote that either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. What, it wasn't filled with "ya betcha"?
If she had written it, every sentence would end with ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazzgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Not true Hoops.
Every sentence would've ended with "also, too". :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ya betcha!
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. I guess they noticed that only 4 out of 33 op-ed writers are women. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chandler2 Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. SPalin is very likely to run and WIN the GOP nomination
for president. She's actually the ideal candidate as far as "power people" are concerned, because she'll do whatever
they want her to do. She is like most people - in the sense that her drive is to "be" - as opposed to those rare
folks whose drive is to "do".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. The WaHo Editorial Board and Palin seem like a natural to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. LOL!
Yep..... easter bunnies candies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. They have a yearly Peeps diorama contest.
This submission from BoRev was, sadly, rejected. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. featuring an attention deficit media whore. makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC