Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Water

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madamesilverspurs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 09:33 PM
Original message
Water
SAN DIEGO — A California judge on Thursday tentatively invalidated a landmark pact to curtail the state's overuse of water and allow other Western states to claim their fair share. The 2003 agreement ended of years of bickering over how to divide the Colorado River between California and six western states: Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming. More than 30 million acre-feet of water — enough to cover the state of Pennsylvania a foot deep — would move from farms to cities in Southern California over the 75-year life of the deal.

Superior Court Judge Roland Candee ruled in Sacramento that the state improperly agreed to pick up much of the cost of saving the shrinking Salton Sea in the southeastern California desert. Restoring the state's largest lake was a crucial piece of the agreement. The state put no limit on costs, “even if they ultimately amounted to millions or billions of dollars,” violating a constitutional limit on assuming debts, Candee wrote.

“The Court has no ability to sanction a way to contract around the Constitution,” he wrote. The judge will hear arguments next Thursday to decide whether to make the ruling final.

Cities like San Diego and Los Angeles were taking billions of extra gallons of Colorado River water over the years, angering other Western states. The pact outlined a plan for California to wean itself. Much of the water affected by the deal goes to San Diego. It calls for Imperial Valley, California's biggest user of Colorado River water, to sell as much as 90 billion gallons each year to San Diego — roughly a third of the city's future water needs.

Kevin Kelley, spokesman for the Imperial Irrigation District, said the ruling “might have the makings of a perfect storm” if it is upheld. The San Diego County Water Authority board will consider its next steps at a board meeting next week, said Dennis Cushman, assistant general manager. “The water is flowing and will continue to flow indefinitely until the legal issues are sorted out,” he said. “There's no panic button to press right now.”

Imperial asked the judge to bless the agreement, a tactic to blunt legal challenges from landowners and other opponents. Critics challenged the state's commitment to pay for restoring the Salton Sea, which is fed by Colorado River irrigation channels. Four Southern California water agencies had agreed to cap their costs at $133 million. The state would pick up the rest. One estimate in court documents pegged the total cost at $193 million, which would leave the state on the hook for $60 million.

Malissa McKeith, an attorney representing Imperial Valley landowners, called the ruling a “fatal blow” to the deal.

A spokesman for California Attorney General Jerry Brown, Evan Westrup, did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday night.


--- from Associated Press

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Salton Sea exists solely as a result of mans arrogance and incompetence
A hundred years ago some sleazy developers constructed a system of irrigation canals to take Colorado River water to the low lying Imperial Valley, much of it sitting below sea level in the area just north of the Mexican border. After one particularly harsh winter, the Colorado running full of snowmelt and rain runoff, burst through their intake structure and flowed to the lowest point in the valley, which became the Salton Sea. It was several years before the breach was repaired and an enormous amount of the rivers flow was diverted to this huge lake. The only inflow the sea has had since then is a canal that flows north into it from Mexico, carrying raw sewage, fertilizers and other agricultural chemicals and other pollutants. It is a hopelessly contaminated body of water and no amount of fresh water diverted into it to clean it up is justified.

It would be better to let it dry up except that the toxic dust would be blown by wind for hundreds of miles around.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC