I read just now a news release from the office of Mississippi governor Haley Barbour. He says the Senate's HCR bill is going to raise the income requirement so that those with incomes 133 percent of the poverty rate can take advantage of Medicaid. He says states will end up having to raise taxes or cut other services to fund this.
Is he right? I've not yet seen any report that Medicaid would be touched by the Senate bill. But it certainly needs to be. And it's one mechanism by which something near a single-payer system could be achieved. States should raise income taxes on the well-to-do to fund this.
An excerpt from the news release follows:
December 11, 2009
GOVERNOR BARBOUR: FEDERAL EXPANSION OF MEDICAID WILL BURDEN STATE BUDGET
Current healthcare proposals will necessarily raise taxes in Mississippi
Current Congressional healthcare proposals to expand Medicaid coverage to individuals above the federal poverty line would greatly increase costs to the states at a time when tax revenues are shrinking, Governor Haley Barbour wrote in a letter to Mississippi senators and U.S. Senate leadership.
If Medicaid coverage were to apply up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level, the number of Mississippians on the program would grow to more than 1 million individuals, or one in three citizens. Costs to Mississippi taxpayers for this massive expansion would swell to $1.3 billion over the next 10 years.
"There is no way for Mississippi to pay the proposed extra costs of Medicaid except by raising our sales or income tax or both," Governor Barbour said.
http://www.governorbarbour.com/news/2009/dec/11.12.09senatehealthcareletter.html