|
Agree about taking single-payer off the table as a strategic error.
However --- no matter what kind of reform was introduced, it was going to be almost impossible to pass the Congress as long as the Senate did not change Rule 22, the filibuster rule.
But not having the guts and fortitude to change the rule, the Senate Democratic leadership almost guaranteed that three or four disgruntled, intransigent, conceited Senators could hold the whole process hostage. The irony, of course, is that the 40 Republicans are virtually irrelevant to the process, it is the 'independent' who caucuses with the Democrats and 'conservative' Democrats who are the problem.
There is a clear majority in both houses of Congress for real, genuine, progressive health insurance reform -- it is one Senate rule that has totally warped the legislation.
Google 'filibuster' and you can find plenty of articles explaining how a simple majority in the Senate could have changed Rule 22.
Now, who is responsible for this lack of foresight, uh?
|