Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

15,000 will die from CT scans done in 1 year

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:29 PM
Original message
15,000 will die from CT scans done in 1 year
:wow: 70 million scans done in 2007

Scans have higher levels of radiation than thought, researchers say

"CHICAGO - Radiation from CT scans done in 2007 will cause 29,000 cancers and kill nearly 15,000 Americans, researchers said Monday.

The findings, published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, add to mounting evidence that Americans are overexposed to radiation from diagnostic tests, especially from a specialized kind of X-ray called a computed tomography, or CT, scan.

"What we learned is there is a significant amount of radiation with these CT scans, more than what we thought, and there is a significant number of cancers," said Dr. Rita Redberg, editor of the Archives of Internal Medicine, where the studies were published.

"It's estimated that just from the CT scans done in one year, just in 2007, there will be 15,000 excess deaths," Redberg said in a telephone interview..."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34420356/ns/health-cancer/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. But they make such pretty pictures of your insides.
And once the very, very expensive machine is paid for, they make lots and lots of money!

:sarcasm:



I hate for-profit medicine with a burning passion. :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. what about MRIs?
I had four done in a six month span two years ago

plus two CT scans

no wonder I've got this thing growing out of my armpit....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. MRIs don't involve ionizing radiation.
Ionizing radiation is the dangerous kind; MRIs use only electromagnetic radiation, which has a much longer "wave" than ionizing radiation and doesn't cause tissue damage or mutation like IR does. MRIs are safe.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. so, the shorter the wavelength, the more dangerous, as in gamma rays, which
have a really really tiny wavelength?

I used to know all that stuff, but all the xrays/cat scans I've had over the years have roasted my memory

thx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yep! That's a pretty good rule of thumb.
An MRI has a nice long wavelength, so it isn't going to hurt you any more than radio station broadcasts would hurt you. X-rays and gamma rays (among others) have very short wavelengths, and thus can do a lot of damage to our DNA. The radiation causes nucleic acids that comprise our DNA strands to get deleted or mixed around, which causes mutations. If enough "bad" mutations rack up, a cell could turn cancerous.

Does that help? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cowcommander Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Holy cow!
How did this technology even get this commonplace in hospitals if it was that dangerous!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Shit!I had 4 cts last year!
my head must GLOW!Thanks for this info...I'll research it more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. I had 4 CT scans done in 1981 and am fine. I've had none since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC