Bwah-HAH Gawker had a "crazy-off" of PALIN-ites vs Scientologists!1

[UTUSN]

**********QUOTE********
http://gawker.com/5427677/crazy+off-sarah-palin+ites-vs-scientologists?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+gawker%2Ffull+%28Gawker%29&utm_content=My+Yahoo

Crazy-Off: Sarah Palin-ites vs. Scientologists

Of late the two topics that have garnered us the most spittle-flecked emails have been the rogue and the frauds. We've picked a selection of the finest, juiciest nuts so you can judge for yourself which group is more rabid.

It was, namely, these two articles - on Palin's Washington Post Op-Ed and Scientology's new crusade - that caused mouth-breathing supporters of both groups to lay down their banjos and e-meters respectively and settle down to write us/me nice emails like the ones that follow. As a side note: both groups tend towards weird or outdated email addresses. AOL seems to host more nuts than any other provider. ....

(Excerpts from PALINite e-mails)

Yes. No. Maybe. Um, I don't know, sorry. You lost me. But whatever the case, please leave Ted Danson out of it. You can insult me all you want, but when you lay an e-finger on Ted, it's too much.

On to Scientology!

Scientology emails fall into two categories. The first are people sending messages explaining what had happened to them in dealings with the church. Several people also called up to say they'd been treated similarly. ....

(Excerpt e-ltr)

The second set are from absolutely bonkers Scientologists who want to defend the religion. But can't stop speaking in jargon. They're repetitive to the point of ridiculousness, but this sums them up: ....

(Excerpts)

There you have it! If you had to be stuck in an elevator with a Scientologist or a Palinite, which would it be?

Send an email to Ravi Somaiya, the author of this post, at [e-mail].

********UNQUOTE********