I missed the interview (Andrea Mitchell, Jay Rockefeller) -- why did Rockefeller
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 01:20 PM
Original message |
I missed the interview (Andrea Mitchell, Jay Rockefeller) -- why did Rockefeller |
|
say Howard Dean is wrong in his assessment of the bill? Anybody catch that? Thanks.
|
OmmmSweetOmmm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Any scion of one of the biggest capitalist familes of our country would say that. |
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. And he's putting party before principle |
|
A lot of Democrats seem to operating under the delusional that a bill with "health care" in its title is better than no bill - even if it screws their base.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Good point. I can sort of see their side of it, but I think this is so far gone |
|
that even with the "health care" title there won't be a smidgen of health care contained within. Thanks.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. I kind of view him as one of the good guys even though he's one of THEM. nt |
BlueCaliDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Because the bill as is, is still better than Dean's in 2004 according to Ezra Klein |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. Saw that thread, but haven't read it yet. But just because it's "better than |
|
Dean's" (whether that's true or not) isn't a reason to pass a bill. Better doesn't necessarily mean good, so if that's his reasoning, I'm not inclined to agree. Thanks!
|
alsame
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I've admired Jay's positions throughout this process, but that interview made |
|
me ill. He kept saying 'so what?' that we didn't get everything.
The 'so what' is that people are going to die because of lack of medical care. In the United States of America. That is just unacceptable to me, Jay.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. Oooh, that would have pissed me off had I heard it. I admire him, too -- |
|
especially given his background (extra points), but that, as you say, is unacceptable. Thanks!
|
tomm2thumbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 02:28 PM
Response to Original message |
9. he was playing the 'oh well, we got some stuff, so let's count our candy and move on' game |
|
I hope there is one or two brave Democrats who will see this corporate mess for what it is - and strip out anything that has to do with funding the Insurance companies. And the mandate - that has got to be the most idiotic thing ever - forcing people to participate in an already corrupt and mismanaged system of corporate wallet rape.
He is obviously worn out, but that is no excuse for jumping on Dean while coddling up to Lieberman on Face the Nation - None.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:43 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.