Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It is long overdue for Obama to dump Rahm Emanuel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:55 AM
Original message
It is long overdue for Obama to dump Rahm Emanuel
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 10:57 AM by Mari333




'The White House wants Reid to hand Joe Lieberman the farm.
An aide briefed on discussions with the White House says that there would be no story if Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel hadn't interceded. The aide confirmed an account, reported by Huffington Post, that Emanuel visited Reid personally, telling him to cut a deal with Lieberman.

Then the aide provided more detail.

Emanuel didn't just leave it to Reid to find a solution. Emanuel specifically suggested Reid give Lieberman the concessions he seeks on issues like the Medicare buy-in and triggers'

'We didn't elect Barack Obama to pass a health reform bill that Joe Lieberman and his insurance cronies approve of.'











http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lee-stranahan/a-rahm-too-far-time-for-o_b_392190.html


and a few others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obama likes and trusts him. And chose him first. He takes flak for Obama. nt
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 10:57 AM by Captain Hilts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. they remind me of Rove and Bush.
that is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. I was hoping our president wouldn't need a minder. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. It was way overdue the day Obama named him to the post. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. K & R
Way overdue....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why? So Obama can tell somebody else to cut deals like this?
Do you REALLY think that Rahm is calling the shots? What could possibly be gained by simply having somebody else in his position?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. he is just one of the sellouts in the admin
I know, I know, there are plenty.
you are right, the big corps wont let anyone get into power it seems, unless they sell out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Get rid of his consiglieri?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yep, but it ain't gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. Obama CHOSE
Rahm and will keep Rahm because they are two cozy peas in a pod.

Get over it folks. We were and are the fools. Obama talked a good talk but his choices of Geithner, Summers, Rahm and yes, Senate mentor Liebermann say it all. Anything for Wall Street and Isreal...

Flame me, I don't give a shit any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
11. Let's face it: President Obama chose Rahm Emanuel...
...and he shows no sign of regretting that choice.

Rahm Emanuel works for President Obama. Anything Emanuel does, he does on President Obama's behalf. There is no sign, none at all, that President Obama disagrees with anything Rahm has done.

As President Truman said: "The buck stops here."

President Obama is the one we need to be focused on. The policies start with him and he has the power. Unfortunately, we can see that what he said during the campaign and what he is doing as President are at odds.

Now don't get me wrong. I did not see him as a radical leftist, or even as a moderate leftist. He was and is a centrist. The unfortunate thing is, as soon as he was elected he became that peculiar form of a centrist, that is really a right-winger. Albeit in his case, a "moderate" right-winger. The DLC type, the inside-the-Beltway type. The type that believes that the USA is a "center-right" country -- in spite of all the polls that show broad support for a center-left agenda.

My opinion of him, after the giveaway to the banksters, after taking single-payer off the table at the outset, after he chose to dismiss the left and the liberal base, after his kowtowing to Republicans and Lieberman, while taking jabs at his own base and at Dean: well suffice to say I am beyond disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. So according to Rahm, Traitor Joe is "the decider" on HC reform?
That's enough for me -- sorry Rahm, go take your corrupt politics elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yes, and a few others like Geithner, Gates...... It's okay to
hire one left-over from Bush for a cabinet position, as a gesture of
bi-partisanship. But a whole slough of them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. The surgery would be too dangerous and risk both patients
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndrewP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. That is so not going to happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC