|
Enforcement.
I don't care what kinds of requirements or restrictions they place on the insurers; if there's no public option, requirements and restrictions have to be enforced (through some means other than competition).
There are only two other possibilities: (A) massive governmental regulation, or (B) individuals being able to enforce their rights via lawsuits.
If there's no public option, the insurer doesn't have to worry about everyone switching over. So the only things to worry about are (A) or (B) above.
(B) is not going to work, because it's far too slow and expensive for individuals to file a lawsuit every time an insurer wrongfully denies a claim. Indeed, (B) has always been available, and obviously has not done the job.
That leaves (A). Think about just how massive the governmental regulation and oversight would have to be to keep the instances of wrongful denial and the like down to a truly negligible proportion. Talk about having government regulators breathing down your neck; well, that's what it would take to keep these succubi in line. And there's no way in h*ll the new bill is going to establish and fund the kind of regulation and regulatory agency that would be needed.
|