Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A few little comments from Howard Dean and that HRC bill gets catapulted to the front

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 09:14 PM
Original message
A few little comments from Howard Dean and that HRC bill gets catapulted to the front
of the soup line. Just sayin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. The schedule had to do with the holidays, not the doctor. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Exactly
They wanted to get home for the holidays, public interests be damned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. "hurry up and pass it before he talks again and ruins it!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wish he had uttered "scrap it" when the public option fell off the table. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Makes me think he knew what he was
doing? Lieberman backed off of medicare for more when the left was happy and suddenly Dean is pushing back against the current bill - hard. I dunno ... food for thought. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. John Edwards had the whole lot of them pegged when he said you gotta fight them. You see where
that got him. And that was after that jerk from chamber pledged to spend 60 mil to smear him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I supported Edwards b/c he had the most progressive platform
but, I'm glad in retrospect he did not win the nomination. This of course, due to his personal shenanigans. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah, but remember how lame the other candidates were on health-care before he dropped out. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitsune Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Personally, I'd still rather have him.
Monogamy is not the default human condition. People fuck up all the time. Just because he's a politician doesn't somehow make it ten thousand times worse. The only time it matters, as far as I'm concerned, is if the person involved is a hypocrite. Which is why I laugh myself silly when it happens to all the holier-than-thou Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I'm still pissed at him. Big Time! His lack of restraint showed his lack of commitment. nt
Edited on Sat Dec-19-09 09:48 PM by Snotcicles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Not me.
I no longer trust him. Not to mention, he'd have lost the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitsune Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I dunno, I think we could have run a ham sandwich last year and won.
Granted, Edwards would probably have screwed us over just as bad once he got into office. The wealthy interests wouldn't allow anyone into office they didn't already own lock, stock, and barrel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC