Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dear Mr. President......One Simple Question and I will Shut Up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:02 PM
Original message
Dear Mr. President......One Simple Question and I will Shut Up
I understand there is some controversy surrounding whether you supported, campaigned or pushed for the public option. Whatever, at the end of the day we will not have a public option, or a medicare buy in. When you did talk about a public option you cited the very important reason for one which would provide competition and keep the insurance industry "honest" which would keep premiums affordable for everyone - especially since everyone would have to buy the product.

My question is this - what is the alternative? What mechanism will there be to provide competition and affordability? You said you got 95% of everything you wanted in the bill and skyrocketing premium costs must have made up at least 20% of what you wanted.

Please just help me understand this and I will shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. .
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think you're just supposed to shut up.
You're not supposed to question your leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. lead us or get the hell out of our way..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's an honest question and constructed with numbers that would allow a focused answer.
Edited on Tue Dec-22-09 10:13 PM by peacetalksforall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good question. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well I don't expect to answer you personally so I'll try for him
for price controls in the senate version there are exchanges that anyone will be able to buy into that encourage competition between providers. There are also provisions to set up non profit alternatives inside those exchanges which should also help to keep premiums down. On top of that there are mandates on the minimum of each health care dollar that must be spent 85% for large group insurers and 80% for small group insurers. It will no longer be possible to be charges more based on anything other than age and even then the max spread allowed is 1-3 where it is currently 1-4 or better.

There is training for doctors and nurses funds for local clinics and other measures in there as well to help try to bring down the end costs which with any luck will also help to bring down the costs of the premiums.


Also there are subsidies for people buying insurance depending on income that will help make health care affordable or more affordable for millions.


Lots of good stuff in there to try and control costs and the CBO has estimated that it will bring down the costs for most people as opposed to doing nothing.

It could be stronger to be sure but things always can.

Hopefully that helps you to understand. The bill is fairly easy to understand and posted online so you can read it yourself.

I encourage you to stop letting others tell you what to think about it and educate yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The CBO doesnt' give a flying fuck about costs for PEOPLE
It is mandated to analyze costs to GOVERNMENT only. And FUCK age rating. Anyone who advocates it is a straight out sociopath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Rage on my uninformed friend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. The CBO is about costs to government, period. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I really think I have read everything out there as well as listened to
others opinions and their interpretations of the two bills (although it looks like the senate one will be what we are left with). So as to educating myself on this, I think I have.

I think the profit margin is misleading some people because the insurance companies could opt to approve expensive treatments versus inexpensive therefore, their profit (not margin) would increase. I have yet to see anything out there or in the bill that takes those types of decisions away from the insurance companies as opposed to leaving it with the physicians/patients...which is how it works now. The insurance companies will also be free to raise premiums based on expenses - which they help to drive up.

I plan on sending this everyday until I hear something or just give up or some reporter finally asks this question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes if you buy into silly conspiracy talk then this bill is the devil
All of a sudden insurers are going to demand pricier treatments :eyes:

There are mandated coverage levels that are the same as what congress has now. If your doctors order anything withing those coverage parameters your insurance company is forced to cover it.

I don't think you really want to educate yourself on it i think you are looking for reasons to be pissed off. The bill is out there for all to read go read it yourself and stop letting lunatic fringe conspiracy theorists tell you how to think.


You may have read a lot of bloviators opinions on it but you clearly haven't taken the time to read it yourself yet. Do that and stop letting others tell you what to think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Good Lord have you been drinking the Kool-Aid. Insurers will do
anything and everything to jack their profits. They do not care about anything else. Since they can't dump people they will have to find more deviant and immoral ways to get around the laws to make more money.

Take off the blinders!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. LOL OK
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. RE: the 85% thing.... they currently spend 75-80% on avg. An extra 5% is meaningless. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. It was one of the biggest reasons people voted for him
he campaigned specifically for a strong public option and NO mandates. but when in office, he does the exact opposite: NO public option but a strong MANDATE to buy private insurance.

To add insult to injury ...Obama is now saying that he never campaigned on a public option. wtf??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Excellent question. Of course, there is no adequate answer. n/t

Kill the bill.


Forcing people to buy insurance is no more the answer to a failed health care system than forcing people to buy houses is the solution to homelessness.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. 80% of all the premiums taken in must be spent on medical care. I don't
see 70 million dollar salaries coming out of 20% of premiums
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. That's about what it is now
health insurance companies currently use up about 20% for overhead and profit, while Medicare only uses 3%. it won't make any difference. if anything, the insurance companies will simply jack up their rates to make up for any potential losses to their profits.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. Now they are allowed to pick and chose their premium holders. After they are going
to have to take in people with a lot of medical costs. They are going to pay a lot more. I don't know why they would have these stipulations if they would be making tons of money off of their 20%. Maybe they are going to end up paying a lot more than 20%. I just heard that figure on TV, it may be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. As Howard Dean pointed out
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 01:07 PM by rollingrock
this bill will allow the insurance companies to charge elderly customers (and others with more health problems) up to THREE times more than they charge younger customers. this bill has absolutely NO cost controls for the consumer. I would be impressed if the cap was more like 5% because a 20% cap is a joke, especially when there are no cost controls on PREMIUMS and DEDUCTIBLES which the consumer will be paying through their nose, and Medicare's overhead is only 3%. this bill is the insurance industry's wet dream.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Aetna's third quarter net income was 18%. For most companies
that's a pretty nice income. They are going to cut about 625 employees and slash policyholders (probably the old ones). Their CEO in 2008 made $24 million and their profit for 2008 was 1.38 billion after taxes.

When you are talking about that much money - 20% is a huge margin.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Isn't Medicare's administrative overhead something like 2-3%?
Why should taxpayers be throwing away 18% of their healthcare dollars into overinflated, CEO-salary-driven corporate insurance overhead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WT Fuheck Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. understanding is overrated. Just shut up.
Love,
Barack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Is that you Mr. President? Just in case - I just sent it again to the
White House because you haven't left for Hawaii yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmc Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. The real sign of a good compromise...
Both sides are pissed. We got a health care bill. I am not entirely happy with it, but the mandatory insurance is why I backed Hillary initially. In politics (and most dealings for that matter), the sign of a good compromise is that both parties are pissed. I hold hope that this is a stepping stone for a path to a solid bill that will eventually lead to universal health care. The journey of a thousand miles...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC