|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:01 PM Original message |
On MSNBC: Hamsher told Schuster that she had formed common cause with Grover Norquist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomCADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. I Don't Believe It. Transcript? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Believe it. I just watched her being interviewed by Schuster along |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I saw it too. Shuster was surprised and asked Jane to explain. She said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. It's true. Hamsher has joined forces with Norquist... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
17. Her sell out is complete, young Skywalker. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeschutesRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
25. Believe it - I just saw it too on MSNBC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spiritual_gunfighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
29. I saw it it is true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
30. Why don't you believe it? Teabagger Jane isn't shy about it.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
4. Jane Hamsher, Grover Norquist Call for Rahm Emanuel’s Resignation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
5. Unless this is what we want to stand with--NO WAY IN HELL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
7. See this is where people just stop thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
8. Hamsher is a teabagger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:25 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:50 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. she's destroying herself and her own credibility by this kind of move. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 06:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
37. I admire all that Hamsher has done. And I admire her bringing attention... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
9. Strange days. Obama standing with Billy Tauzin. Hamsher standing with Grover Norquist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Politics make STRANGE bedfellows! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 06:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
35. Indeed. Other famous examples in history: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 06:49 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Tsongas and Rudman probably one of the BEST! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 08:11 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Agreed. Liked them both nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
10. Obama critic detected. Must. Destroy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressIn2008 (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
12. If anyone's curious, the video link is here and the discussion starts at 4:19 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
13. It's settled then, Hamsher is officially the enemy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:33 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. She turned me into a newt! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Are_grits_groceries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
14. That's it for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. Norquist is who organized the meetings where talking points were settled upon & disseminated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
18. Finally someone on the left has the balls to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:47 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Yep this went beyond health care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
21. Details are at the link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wardoc (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
23. I get that, but honestly I don't mind allying with a slug if it kills this POS bill because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
24. Good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
26. She really likes being the RW's token liberal stooge, doesn't she? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostInAnomie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
27. She's an idiot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varelse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
28. That's bipartisanship, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:56 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. The status quo, don't make waves progressive effort has failed. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varelse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 06:16 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. A "status quo progressive" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 06:21 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
34. I know who Grover Norquist is(all too well) but who is this Jane Hamster? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
39. Let me just pose a question here, leaving out the personalities involved, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC