|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:00 PM Original message |
The real issue at hand is this: Rahm Emanuel is attempting to create an $800 billion slush fund |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sincerely, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Distract from the issue at hand by attacking the messengers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. What issue? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Rahm is trying to give Fannie and Freddie $800 billion with NO congressional oversight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. This: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. She isn't even digging up shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Do you have evidence she's making shit up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:18 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. That's OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:20 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. If she's lying about Rahm she should be derided for doing so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:21 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. As someone else said -- who do you trust more, Jane or Corporate Rahm Emanuel? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:23 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. HAHAHAHA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:27 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. Keep going.....your false comparisons of faked birth certificates to a legitmate issue are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:28 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. There is ZERO evidence for Hamsher's claims |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:50 PM Response to Reply #18 |
57. removed by author |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Thu Dec-24-09 12:16 AM Response to Reply #18 |
66. I trust Rahm over someone an ally of the Teabaggers and Grover Norquist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:22 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. " If "? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:22 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. If she's lying, prove it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:28 PM Response to Reply #23 |
34. I don't have to prove made up shit is made up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:24 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Like I never campaigned on a Public Option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:25 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. They have no proof that she is lying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:29 PM Response to Reply #29 |
38. She has no proof of her claims. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:26 PM Response to Reply #13 |
31. Only this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:29 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. If no evidence is produced to back up her claims |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:31 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. read the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:35 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. I've read it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:34 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. And she is the one who has made the assertions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:37 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. Correct and Watergate started with allegations as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:40 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Well, let's see, since this shit has been floated about Rahm Emmanuel for the past six years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:41 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Hey you got my support for banning her postings from DU if no evidence is produced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Thu Dec-24-09 08:48 AM Response to Reply #4 |
69. this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Thu Dec-24-09 02:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
73. ProSense: Hamsher = Taitz ........ ProSense = most ironic screen name ever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
3. The answer is no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:11 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. In other words... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I can hear it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. 800 billion dollars in taxpayer money is about to disappear and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
24. They're already comparing her to Nazis.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
42. Absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
19. Karl Rove would be so proud of you *party members* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:22 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. 6 hardcore members and about 12 usernames :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:25 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. HAHAHAHAH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
9. Thanks for posting this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. +800,000,000 nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:27 PM Response to Reply #17 |
32. Sorry, not enough zeros. It's 800,000,000,000.00 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:35 PM Response to Reply #32 |
46. Damn, you're right. What was I thinking, reading millions. Small potatoes for the new game in town. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
11. Agreed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
14. NOT TOXIC AT ALL...they just have an unknown value like our house, devalued 20K=13%, up now to 6% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
20. Sounds plausible to me . nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
26. Jane Hamsher is a true progressive, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:26 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:49 PM Response to Reply #30 |
56. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:29 PM Response to Reply #26 |
36. Yeah, progressives heart Grover Norquist. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:34 PM Response to Reply #36 |
44. Norquist can/should eat shit and die, as far as i'm concerned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:51 PM Response to Reply #44 |
58. I feel the same way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:38 PM Response to Reply #36 |
51. -800.000.000.000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golddigger
![]() |
Thu Dec-24-09 08:36 AM Response to Reply #26 |
68. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
37. Rahm Emanuel's profitable stint at mortgage giant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:30 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. THAIR IS NO PROOF!!! JANE HAMPSHIRE IS A RACIST! WHY DO YOU HATE BLACK PEOPLE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:32 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. I suggest you go to FR and read the posts of pissant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:48 PM Response to Reply #43 |
55. Familiar with the place are ya? hmmm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Binka
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:55 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. Interesting Question Paint hmmmm n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
48. I have no trouble believing this.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
50. Recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
54. Freddie Mac scandals began during Emanuel's watch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 11:02 PM Response to Reply #54 |
62. I'm sorry, that's not a reliable source. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
60. So I didn't know who Jane Hamsher is, and I've never read FireDogLake. Here's my take: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merkins
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
61. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bajamary
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
63. Thanks for posting this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 11:57 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. no problem. unfortunately the Rahmbots are out in full force tonight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CynicalObserver
![]() |
Thu Dec-24-09 10:31 AM Response to Reply #65 |
72. I am kind of surprised at how naive people are about politics and money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bajamary
![]() |
Wed Dec-23-09 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
64. Thanks for posting this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Dec-24-09 12:18 AM Response to Original message |
67. Next on the hit list: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Thu Dec-24-09 09:12 AM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newspeak
![]() |
Thu Dec-24-09 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
71. thanks for posting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Thu Dec-24-09 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
74. Well well well....would you look what's taking place today? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Thu Dec-24-09 02:57 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. More here, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Thu Dec-24-09 02:57 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. according to NoSense though, Jane must be lying. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Thu Dec-24-09 03:02 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. The bush tactic of repeating the lie a gazillion times and then ignoring all facts to the contrary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC