|
In one of the pro-gun Democratic regions of the blogosphere that I frequent, we've got this Republican campaign staffer who's encouraging Texas Democrats to consider supporting a Republican gubernatorial candidate in the primary against incumbent Rick Perry and Kay Bailey Hutchison, even if we wind up voting for Democrat Bill White on Election Day.
All I did was point out that if a Democrat votes in a Republican primary in Texas, that person cannot participate in any Democratic convention for the rest of the year - I believe Texas Republicans have a similar requirement concerning primary voters. The response I got from this staffer, however, was that this requirement is "one reason why the political party system is corrupt."
I know the party system gives all of us headaches once in a while, but this does not seem like an undue imposition on voters who identify themselves with a particular party. I know New York is a special case with its patchwork of minor party affiliates, and then there's the "Democrat/Farm/Labor" arrangement in Minnesota, but for the rest of America, does it seem at all unreasonable that participation in state party caucuses, primaries, conventions, etc. requires you to at least vote for the candidates of said party from the get-go instead of splitting tickets?
|