Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Okay the question of a decade, which years constitute a Decade?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:45 AM
Original message
Poll question: Okay the question of a decade, which years constitute a Decade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. 2000 to 2009 "The Reign of Error"
:shrug: does it really matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. The thing is that if you get the millennium wrong
it's clear you'll have the decade wrong as well. The last millennium ended in 2000 not 1999.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. No, the standards are different for both
The decades are classified by the second to last digit; the millennium (and centuries) are tallies of the number of years.

The 21st century is 2001-2100.
The third millennium is 2001-3000.
The aughts were 2000-2009.
The teens will be 2010-2019.
And so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Is that British, American or
international?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. The century is international standard.
Decades have no standard definition, so the prevailing one (0-9) applies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Other.
The first ten. Always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. The anal-retentive sticklers for accuracy in all things
will insist that the years 2001-2010 comprise the decade - and I hope their bleatings subside quicker than those who insisted on trying to spoil millennial celebrations 10 years ago.

Besides, decades aren't always defined by actual calendar years anyway. For instance, who would insist that 1961 had more in common with 1969 than it did with 1955? Societal shifts occur without regard to decade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. Decade is simply ten-so any ten years is a decade
The Roaring 20's were 1920 to 1929. The sixties didn't include 1970
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Exactly... The "ZERO" decade should be 2000-2009
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tmyers09 Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. EXACTLY!
You wouldn't consider 1990 to be in the 80's, would you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. 2001-2010
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. Technical and useful =/= same.
For example everybody with basic physics knows that what most people call centrifugal force is actually centripetal. Well sure people who count decades starting from the (cavalierly placed and guesswork) year 1 CE know that succeeding decades start with a 1 too. But hardly anybody but pedantic curmudgeons uses this technicality in general discourse just like the centripetal example. It's much easier to communicate in terms that are understood, and the law of NRN tells you a decade in the calendar-changing sense (as has been notesd, 1975-1984 is a decade too) will be seen as changing when the penultimate number clicks over.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. It's so obviously 2000-2009.
When did the sixties begin? Was it 1960?

When did the seventies begin? Was it 1970?

When did the eighties begin? Was it 1980?

When did the nineties begin? Was it 1990?

This decade began January 1, 2000, and will end December 31, 2009.

Now, if the question had been "when did the century begin?" that's another issue entirely, but decades are labeled from the present usage. A decade is ten years as we perceive ten years to be, and the unit we identify a decade is by the third of the four numbers in it. The "aught" decade ends this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. An interesting question is when did those decades end socially and culturally
"The sixties" ran from about 1963 to late 1969
"The seventies" ran from late 1969 to 1981
"The eighties" ran from 1981 to 1989
"The nineties" -- when did they stop culturally? The 2000 stock market crash? 9/11? Enron's collapse?

Now, I'm a naval ordnance buff, so I think the aughts ended a few months ago when India launched its first nuclear submarine and sort of officially started the coming China/India arms race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Interesting concept. Here's my version.
The 60s ran from 1963 to 1974. I agree that 1963 was the year of the cultural shift we think of when we think of the 60s. Kent State was the harbinger of doom for the war in 1971. I was in SEA at the time, and the news that four students had been killed by National Guard troops on the Kent State campus sent a shock wave through troops. 1971 was when the war ended, for all practical purposes. In 1972, we swept the Democratic party leaders aside and nominated McGovern. Then 1973 saw Watergate explode onto the scene, and 1974 saw Nixon resign. I'd say that's when the 60s ended. From then until the taking of the hostages in Iran, it was party time in the USA.

The 70s ran from 1974 to 1980. I'd say the election of Reagan in November of 1980 ended the 70s, which were mainly about fun in between the two ends of the decade.

The 80s ran from 1980 to 1992. The Reagan-Bush era. Crushing unions and imprisoning people.

The 90s ran from 1992 to 2000. The Clinton boom era. The ascendency of the internet.

The 00s ran from 2000 to 2009. The Bush era, and its lingering control of the early Obama administration. The "Me" Decade, where cell phones and social sites dominated the cultural landscape as the economy tanked, the country's infra structure failed, and wars of aggression drained the federal budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Interesting; we put GHWB into different eras
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 11:55 AM by Recursion
To me the eighties ended when the Berlin Wall came down; I put Poppy Bush and Clinton together as "90's presidents" -- the two Presidents of the undisputed American world hegemony.

And I like your point about the "me" decade: that's why the iPod is so emblematic of it -- nobody talks to each other or even makes eye contact on the subway anymore because we're all plugged in to our personal jukebox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Exactly. Where people got the idea that it was attached to century/ milenium is puzzling
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 09:32 AM by JVS
If they need to say the first decade of something, then it's the first decade of the 20-hundreds. Just like the 19-hundreds were 100 years, but just a touch different from the 20th century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. I distinguish between decades and centuries
IMO the first year of a decade (2000 in this case) is in the previous century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
16. Did "the Roaring Twenties" include 1930? Did "the Sixties" include 1970?
Technically, 2001-2010 might be correct (assuming there was no 'year zero'), but in common usage the answer is 2000-2009.

I think.

:donut:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I would tend to agree.
The whole "decade" thing seems rather fluid to me.

Technically, like you said, if there was no "year zero", the decade would be 2001 to 2010


But culturally, people tend to view them 1920 to 1930, 1930 to 1940, etc.

And as someone else pointed out upthread, even 1985 to 1995 is a decade



So everyone is correct...

:7

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC